Wednesday, January 31, 2007

You'd better invite Oprah, Chrissy

Just when you thought (hoped?) I'd let the clock run out on Chrissy Popadics' 15 minutes of fame, I stumbled on this story out of the Idaho Statesman.

Chrissy Popadics is the Boise State cheerleader who received a marriage proposal from football player Ian Johnson, right after Ian scored on a trick play two point conversion to seal an upset victory in the Fiesta Bowl.

The linked story advises that Jesse Jackson has been invited to the pending nuptials... he asked for an invite... and Chrissy reveals that she's also had an inquiry from Oprah Winfrey's production company, Harpo. The Idaho columnist speculates that Oprah may be looking for a wedding invite, too.

Herewith some unsolicited personal advice for the bride-to-be: Send her the invite, Chrissy. Maybe Tom Cruise could get away with snubbing her -- even after jumping on her couch -- but, Chrissy, I don't think you want to start off your married life on Oprah's bad side.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Connecting the dots... closing the loop... shattering the illusion....

I regularly read Zay N. Smith's Quick Takes in the Chicago Sun-Times and -- as you can probably tell from the number of times I've cited it in these postings -- I enjoy the column thoroughly.

Mr. Smith, however, has one regular feature in his column that often bugs me: He will come up with an absurd headline and then say only, "There is probably an interesting story behind that."

Now I am a cynical person and I have wondered, from time to time, whether Mr. Smith is simply making up these headlines. This morning, for instance, he wrote:
News Headline: "Underpants rage burns down house."

There is probably an interesting story behind that.
Now I wasn't particularly interested in this item, nor did I have a burning desire to investigate to determine whether it had, in fact, been invented or whether it was an actual story reported somewhere.

But today at lunch, clicking away between bites, I came across this story on a site called Metro.co.uk. The item was indeed headlined, "Underpants rage burns down house." And the story? Through the miracle of cut and paste, it follows:
An angry husband who threw old clothes from his wardrobe in the garden and set fire to them because he could not find his clean underpants accidentally burnt his home down.

Ivo Jerbic, 55, from Prikraj close to the capital Zagreb told police he had flipped out after failing to find any clean underpants in the closet full of old clothes, and had thrown them all in the garden and set fire to them.

He told police: 'My wife never throws anything out, I just lost my temper.'
So we have established that Mr. Smith did not make up today's throwaway headline. Why he thought it might be so interesting, however, is not nearly as clear.

Although, there was another story on the same site, "Viagra-spiked wine nearly kills husband." (With apologies to Mr. Smith) there is probably an interesting story behind that one, too.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Why you have to read all the way through

I saw a link to this site over the weekend and, before I'd finished the second paragraph I was up in arms. Here's the paragraph in question, from a group blog entitled "That's Fit," this particular entry being authored by Bethany Sanders:
[D]id you know that recent research suggests that caffeine may be the new up and coming treatment for baldness? Researchers believe that caffeine protects hair follicles by blocking a chemical called DHT, which is produced by the male hormone testosterone. In fact -- and this was news to me -- experts believe that men with more testosterone in their bodies are at a higher risk of balding, especially when there's a family history of hair loss. DHT damages hair follicles, but caffeine appears to block that process and stimulate growth. In recent lab test, hair follicles exposed to caffeine grew an extra 33 to 40 percent.
Given the amount of coffee I drink, if there were in fact a direct correlation between caffiene intake and hair growth, every inch of my surface area should be covered with lush, luxuriant hair.

The Addams Family character I'd most resemble would be Cousin Itt -- not Uncle Fester.


Oh, yes, I'd worked myself into a fine dander.

But then I read more of the post in question:
....Researchers don't believe that drinking more coffee will affect your scalp -- or your hair loss -- in any significant way. In fact, you'd have to drink a heart-racing 60 cups of coffee to gain any benefit.... Instead, a German cosmetics firm has developed a caffeine-infused lotion that can be rubbed directly onto the scalp. If it works, it seems like a simple and natural solution.
Instead of going beserk like some jittery, hopped-up caffiene fiend, I read the article all the way through... and was mollified.

Meantime, although I'm not interested in trying any new German lotions or potions, I am thinking about using the morning coffee grounds as a scalp massage. If nothing else, the grounds might stain what hair there is a darker color....

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Monday, January 29, 2007

The Curmudgeon goes to the grocery store

One evening, before we were married, my soon-to-be wife and her roommate decided to have a normal, sit-down, grownup dinner.

That in itself will tell you how long ago this was: In this long ago time before the Internet, there was a widely-held belief that grownups ate meals while seated at a table, without blogging or even the TV to provide distraction.

We were young; what did we know?

Anyway, I was already working for a living and the party was delayed until I could arrive. When I did, I and the roommate's boyfriend (now her husband) were dispatched to the nearby grocery, there to pick up a couple of last minute provisions for the meal.

It was a simple task, really, and even a simple person such as myself should have been capable of discharging it.

But I was hungry. I was lured to the girls' apartment on the false pretense that I was going to receive a meal -- and upon arriving was instead dispatched on an errand. My subconscious took over.

I got the couple of items that I was instructed to get -- and every variety of snack cracker and dessert that the Certified grocery chain had to offer.

And even though I paid for these excesses, the young woman who was to become Long Suffering Spouse was mortified. She made a mental note: I was not to be trusted in the grocery store.

That's not to say that, in the intervening 25 years, I have not been sent out to get this or that as exigent circumstances required. I certainly have. When the late night pharmacy runs were made, it was usually I who made them. But when we needed a gallon of milk on a Sunday morning I have all too often returned home with donuts or a coffee cake besides. The lesson learned a quarter century ago has been regularly reinforced: I am not to be allowed to do the grocery shopping.

I have not minded this arrangement.

But this weekend may have changed things.

We have just begun Catholic Schools Week. Parents always grumble that the run-up to Catholic Schools Week always includes a number of big, involved projects for the kids -- projects into which the kids' parents are all too often drawn. But every teacher wants a gaudy display to impress the young parents, the new parents, who are deciding whether to invest a healthy portion of their futures in Catholic education. And there's lately been some sort of unifying theme and the whole school is decorated....

Long Suffering Spouse cut out wall decorations all week long -- while we both encouraged Youngest Son to complete his various gaudy projects -- and then she had to hang everything up in her room and the adjacent hallway. And she still had to design and give a re-take on a test. I was with her for three hours Saturday trying to figure out how to set up a slideshow on her Apple computer that would play on the TV in the room while the parents came by and ooohed and aaaahed.

I'm sure that there are Apple users among you. But most of the people in any business I know of are locked into Wintel machines. We know we are unwitting drones of an Evil Empire, but, like the clever slaves in classical comedies, we have devised strategies for making the best of our lot. The Apple machines are similar enough to tease us into believing that we can readily apply our hard-won Wintel experience to any problem at hand -- but different enough to dash these hopes, often cruelly. And if the teachers' machines had any documentation, Long Suffering Spouse hasn't seen it. And the Apple machines are "intuitive."

Intuitive means there's nothing in writing. The time I spent learning how to read was entirely wasted, at least for this purpose.

But I figured out how to import the photos LSS wanted and get the slideshow to run and, I will happily testify, the "Ken Burns effect" that the Apple machine used in running the slideshow was very cool.

But now Saturday was gone and Sunday was the Open House that signals the beginning of Catholic School Week. And it was also necessary that someone get the week's groceries.

"I'll do it after the Open House," Long Suffering Spouse told me.

I knew this was reverse psychology -- knew it, and fell for it anyway.

"No," I said, "I'll go while you're at the Open House. That way, when you come home, you can stay home."

She put up a show of reluctance -- although, given my checkered history of grocery shopping lo these many years, maybe it wasn't entirely a show. "Really," she said, "I'll take care of it. We don't need that much this week."

It occurred to me -- in the logical part of my brain -- that LSS has asked me to accompany her to the grocery a couple of times in recent weeks and I've gone with to assist and speed the completion of the task. Maybe she was trying to audition me for a new solo effort. But I pushed these thoughts aside and insisted that I should go. "Especially if there's not much to get, why should you have to make the extra trip?"

Sunday morning, after Mass, Long Suffering Spouse dictated the grocery list to me. It was short. Younger Daughter had already gone to her job; Youngest Son was supposed to be a 'tour guide' at the Open House. I would take LSS and Youngest Son to school, drop them off, and proceed to the grocery.

And it was almost time to go -- and I poured an extra bowl of cereal for myself.

Youngest Son was confused. "I thought we had to leave."

"We do," said Long Suffering Spouse, but not harshly. "Your father just doesn't want to go to the grocery store while he's hungry."

So it was a good news/ bad news outcome: The good news was I didn't return with a lot of unnecessary things. I even got the right brands of most of the things I was sent to get. But the bad news is... I'm afraid she may ask me to do this again.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Friday, January 26, 2007

Sticky Post

My recent Chicago Quiz was too much for non-natives (and I didn't ace it myself) , but, if you'd be interested in seeing the questions with the answers, just click here.

If you're not out lookin' for trouble, but just want to dance to the Superbowl Shuffle, click here.
id= Stumble It!

Driver produces false ID -- the ID of a person wanted for possession of false ID

I can't blame you if your head has already begun hurting as you try and puzzle that one out. Here is a link to Gene Haschak's story in this morning's Kane County editions of the Daily Herald newspaper which tries to explain.

Since I don't know how long the link will be active, here is most of the story:
When an Elgin man bought a fraudulent identification card for $100, he got more than he bargained for — the man whose identity was used on the fake ID was wanted by police.

Juan Galvan, 25, of 1057 South St., Elgin, was arrested at 12:30 a.m. Thursday on the Kimball Street bridge. Police said the tan Maxima he was driving had license plates that were registered to a Saturn.

Galvan handed police identification with the name and personal information of Juan Perez-Leon, who was born on Aug. 22, 1981.

Police checked and found Perez-Leon was wanted on a warrant for a 2004 charge. That charge was for possession of a fraudulent identification card, according to a police report.

Galvan was charged Thursday with possession of a fraudulent identification card.

He also was cited for no insurance, no driver’s license, improper use of registration and suspended license plates, police said.
Listening to this story this morning on the radio I was put in mind of two opposing mirrors... look into either one and see reflections back stretching into infinity.

The Daily Herald story suggests the moral, "Be careful what you pay for." Can you come up with a better one?

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

A Chicago Quiz -- or -- Maybe I'm not so old, after all

Shel, from Musings of a Phenomenal Webmistress sent me this quiz. I had some fun answering the questions that I could -- there were a few on which I had no clue whatsoever, and on others I made some bad guesses.

My score, according to the answers Shel sent with, was 28 out of 40 -- only 70% -- although I dispute one of the stated answers.

I'll post those answers this afternoon. Stay tuned... and see how you fare in the meantime.

And, yes, this quiz is very locally focused. But if Chicago gets the 2016 Olympics you'll be looking for Chicago material... and here it is.

Old Time Chicago Quiz

(1) Name all five of Riverview's roller coasters.

(2) What was the former name of Martin Luther King Drive?


(3) How many times was Richard J. Daley elected mayor?

(4) Identify any two of the candidates who ran against Richard J. Daley for mayor.

(5) What is an alewife? (Hint: It's not a spouse that tipples.)


(6) What did Jack Brickhouse yell when the Cubs hit a home run?

(7) Name, in order, the three papers Mike Royko wrote for.

(8) What gasoline chain had Dino the Dinosaur as a mascot?



(9) Which of Bill Veeck's legs was the peg-leg?

(10) Identify Resurrection Mary.

(11) Why was 1340 North State Parkway a famous address?

(12) Who was Uncle Johnny Coons?

(13) What car dealer was the "Home of the Backward K?"

(14) Name the announcer of TV bowling at Faetz-Niesen.

(15) What was a Green Hornet? (Hint: It's not the guy in the mask.)

(16) Where were the Stock Yards located?

(17) What type of store was Morris B. Sachs?

(18) When he wasn't doing Riverview commercials, what was Two-Ton Baker's profession?

(19) What Catholic archbishop has a suburb named after him?

(20) What business had the phone number MOhawk 4-4100?

(21) Identify one Chicago street that was part of U.S. Route 66. (It winds from Chicago to L.A./ More than 2,000 miles on the way/ Get your kicks/ On Route 66....)

(22) Name the sponsor of TV wrestling who was killed by an unhappy customer.

(23) What was the last home stadium of the Chicago Cardinals? (Yes, this is the same franchise that is now the Arizona Cardinals, coached this past season by former Northwestern and Minnesota Vikings Coach Dennis Green. They didn't do well in Chicago either. And they're still owned by the Bidwill family.)

(24) Name one locally-brewed Chicago beer. (Recent brew-pubs do not count!)

(25) Before Circle, where was the Chicago campus of the University of Illinois?

(26) Where did the Beatles perform on their first trip to Chicago?

(27) Which defunct grocery chain gave S & H Green Stamps?

(28) Name the boxing champ who gave his name to a local milk company.

(29) Where was the Army Induction Center located?

(30) How many inches of snow fell in the January 1967 blizzard?

(31) Who wore an Uncle Sam suit, and was always a losing candidate for public office? (I've given this away in a past entry.)

(32) What public building was often called simply "Eleventh and State?"

(33) Where did Andy the Clown hang out?

(34) Name the TV show that was the source of the local catch-phrase: "Right Here, Harv."

(35) Who were the Lincoln Park Pirates?

(36) What was the old name of the Brown Line 'L?

(37) Where was Skip's located?

(38) What do the call letters of Channel 11 (WTTW) stand for?

(39) Where was Skid Row?

(40) Name two Illinois governors who served time in prison. (George Ryan doesn't count because, though sentenced to jail, he's free pending the outcome of his appeal.)

I warned you that some of these are extremely local... but see how you fare or pass it along to a Chicagoan, ex-Chicagoan or Chicagoan wannabe in your life.

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

Answers to the Chicago Quiz

Thanks to the miracle of "Post Options" I'm putting these after (following? beneath?) the quiz I posted this morning. Even though it's really Friday afternoon. The answers that Shel provided are in blue. My comments are in red.

(1) Name all five of Riverview's roller coasters.
Bobs, Sliver Streak, Comet, Fireball (formerly the Blue Streak), and Flying Turns. (No, the Wild Mouse was not a real rollercoaster.) I didn't know any of these either.

(2) What was the former name of Martin Luther King Drive?
South Park Avenue.

(3) How many times was Richard J. Daley elected mayor?
Six times. 1955, 1959, 1963, 1967, 1971, and 1975.

(4) Identify any two of the candidates who ran against Richard J. Daley for mayor.
Any two of these will suffice: Merriam, Sheehan, Adamowski, Waner, Friedman, Hoellen. But here's an exhaustive list from the Chicago Public Library.

(5) What is an alewife?
A type of fish. The Chicago connection is that great numbers of these fish turned up dead on the shores of Lake Michigan, as this Time Magazine story from 1967 recounts.

(6) What did Jack Brickhouse yell when the Cubs hit a home run?

Hey Hey! If you look close, you can see it's even on his monument just off Michigan Avenue. Cub fans forget that, at one time, Brickhouse also broadcast White Sox games on WGN Television. And, of course, he did the Bears games on radio for many years.

(7) Name, in order, the three papers Mike Royko wrote for.
The Daily News, the Sun-Times, and the Tribune. Royko called me a "yuppie" once when we were at the Billy Goat. But he took it back. Some time I'll tell that story.



(8) What gasoline chain had Dino the Dinosaur as a mascot?
Sinclair. The Sinclair chain must still exist outside of Chicago, or at least it did a few years back. I was with Middle Son going to a baseball tournament in western Illinois and we bought gas at one. I carried the receipt with me until it disintegrated.


(9) Which of Bill Veeck's legs was the peg-leg?

The right one. As I recall, it had an ashtray in it.

(10) Identify Resurrection Mary.

A famous Chicago area ghost. Here's a link to more information about her. At least one 1950's teenage tragedy song rips off this legend.


(11) Why was 1340 North State Parkway a famous address?
This was the original Playboy Mansion.

(12) Who was Uncle Johnny Coons?
The host of a children's TV show. I knew this, although he was before my time.

(13) What car dealer was the "Home of the Backward K?"
Nickey Chevrolet. (Sing along with me now: Nickey, Nickey, Nickey Chevrolet.)

(14) Name the announcer of TV bowling at Faetz-Niesen.
Whispering Joe Wilson. I recognize the name, but I didn't know this one at all.

(15) What was a Green Hornet?
A streetcar.

(16) Where were the Stock Yards located?

Halsted, near 43rd. This is one I marked wrong on my score sheet because I was a couple blocks off.

(17) What type of store was Morris B. Sachs?
A clothing store.

(18) When he wasn't doing Riverview commercials, what was Two-Ton Baker's profession?
Band leader. I got this one wrong, too.

(19) What Catholic archbishop has a suburb named after him?
The town of Mundelein is named for George Cardinal Mundelein.


(20) What business had the phone number MOhawk 4-4100?
CET for Television. Are you singing along with me? I didn't go to amusement parks but I watched a lot of TV as a kid.


(21) Identify one Chicago street that was part of U.S. Route 66.
Ogden, Adams, or Jackson. I'm embarrassed to say I missed this one.

(22) Name the sponsor of TV wrestling who was killed by an unhappy customer.
Sid Forhman. I'm not embarrassed to have missed this one.

(23) What was the last home stadium of the Chicago Cardinals?
(Updated 2/2/09) This is a trick question. Although Chicagoans of a certain age remember the Cardinals playing at Comiskey Park, an article in the Sports section of the January 25, 2009 Chicago Tribune confirmed that, in their very last season in Chicago, the Cards played four games at Soldier Field. They also played two games that year in Minnesota.

(24) Name one locally-brewed Chicago beer. (Recent brew-pubs do not count!)
Old Chicago, Meister Brau, Tavern Pale, Drewrys, Edelweiss, etc. I had a brain cramp on this and couldn't remember any of these.

(25) Before Circle, where was the Chicago campus of the University of Illinois?
Navy Pier. These days you're not supposed to say "Circle" either; you're supposed to say the University of Illinois at Chicago.

(26) Where did the Beatles perform on their first trip to Chicago?
Comiskey Park.

(27) Which defunct grocery chain gave S & H Green Stamps?
National. I remember the Green Stamp books. My mother collected.

(28) Name the boxing champ who gave his name to a local milk company.
Joe Louis. Another one I got wrong.

(29) Where was the Army Induction Center located?
Van Buren and Des Plaines Streets. Didn't know this one either.

(30) How many inches of snow fell in the January 1967 blizzard?

27. That's the number I remembered too, but I've also seen 23.1 bandied about. We're celebrating the 40th anniversary of the 1967 blizzard this weekend. If "celebrating" is an appropriate word. I was just a kid and remember it fondly -- but I doubt I'd have the same attitude today.

(31) Who wore an Uncle Sam suit, and was always a losing candidate for public office?
Lar "America First" Daly. Regular visitors should have gotten this one right.

(32) What public building was often called simply "Eleventh and State?"
Police Headquarters.

(33) Where did Andy the Clown hang out?
Comiskey Park. You know, I'm wondering if whoever came up with this quiz was from the South Side -- with the Riverview questions just there to throw people off the trail. Andy's cry: "Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooo White Sox!"

(34) Name the TV show that was the source of the local catch-phrase: "Right Here, Harv."
Bozo's Circus. I watched this show for years. I just don't remember this as a catch-phrase that people used.




(35) Who were the Lincoln Park Pirates?
Lincoln Towing. They were the subject of the Steve Goodman song, "Lincoln Park Pirates" which, I believe, was popular in places besides Chicago as well. Are you singing along with me yet?

The streetlamps are on in Chicago tonight/ And lovers are gazin' at stars/ The stores are all closin' and Daley is dozin' and the fat man is counting the cars/ And there's more cars than places to put 'em, he says/ But I got room for 'em all....

Not singing along? Maybe it's my voice. I hope Simon doesn't hear me.

And, yes, I know that's not the right album cover. But it was the best picture I could scrounge.

(36) What was the old name of the Brown Line 'L?
The Ravenswood.

(37) Where was Skip's located?
North Avenue near First Avenue. Another one on which I had no clue either.

(38) What do the call letters of Channel 11 (WTTW) stand for?
Window To The World.

(39) Where was Skid Row?
Madison Street, from Clinton to Halsted. I'd say this is too narrow a location, although certainly accurate.

(40) Name two Illinois governors who served time in prison.
Otto Kerner, Jr. and Dan Walker.

How did you do?
id= Stumble It!

Thursday, January 25, 2007

The barber is getting along in years....

This isn't the barber shop I go to, but it gives you the general idea.

I go to an old-fashioned barber -- not a stylist. There's a beauty shop next door. The ladies are welcome over there, please. A mom can bring junior in, and she's welcome to stay while he gets his haircut... but she can't also get a trim... and we hope she doesn't poke around the magazines in the stack.

There's nothing too wild there, mind you, just some back issues of Esquire or some of the newer "lads' mags." Nothing really explicit... but we don't want the boy's mom seeing this stuff. It would make us -- the barbers, the other customers -- uncomfortable. With luck, these are buried beneath the sports magazines when a kid's mom sits next to the stack.

When I go in with one of the boys I read only the newspapers.

I've been going to this same barber now for some years.

He used to be so good: He'd thin out the hair in places where it was thick, and he'd cut out all the gray ones.

But I'm afraid he's slipping: He must be thinning too much on top because my scalp is all too visible. And I think he's only cutting out the dark hairs now because everything that's left is gray.

Still, I think I'll keep going to the same barber. I'm used to him. He's used to me. And besides, who am I to hurt his business as he's getting so obviously along in years?

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

A dollar spent at Walgreens -- and how we all come from somewhere

I found this at Walgreens Tuesday night and since it cost only a dollar I bought it. Two Fred Allen programs from the 1948 season, toward the end of his radio career.

I had a dentist's appointment yesterday, so I drove to work. That way, I could also listen to the programs. Long Suffering Spouse is a tolerant woman -- she puts up with many of my eccentricities -- but she can't stand to be in the same house with me when I listen to old time radio programs.

Fred Allen died in 1956 at the age of 61; he didn't have the celebrated old age that George Burns or Jack Benny did. Allen's reputation also suffered because his programs don't age well. The ones I listened to yesterday, for example, were chock full of topical references -- I caught most of them -- but not all. And my children would be unlikely to catch any. So many Jack Benny sketches, on the other hand, are timeless -- funny then, funny now -- because they dealt with recognizable people in situations, not current events. (In fairness, I should add that my children do not necessarily agree with my assessment that Jack Benny is still funny. That's because they're stubborn. And they're siding with their mother.)

The Jack Benny - Fred Allen feud is still funny today, 70 years after it started. Some of the scripts are in Allen's book, Treadmill to Oblivion, which I read as a kid. Somewhere along the line my parents disposed of it. I'd love to have it today.

And Allen's parody of game shows, when guest star Jack Benny is named "King for a Day" remains fall down, pound on the floor funny.

Listening to the Fred Allen programs yesterday reminded me that Allen still has an heir enjoying national fame.

David Letterman's feuds with his various networks are right out of the Fred Allen playbook.

And Letterman often comes across as an unhappy man, no matter how successful he has become, or how famous. In the judgment of his contemporaries, Allen also seemed happiest when he was miserable.

Letterman has always acknowledged his debt to Johnny Carson -- who made a career out of doing Jack Benny's doubletake. And Carson and Letterman both have acknowledged their debt to Benny. Benny, in turn, said he borrowed extensively from Frank Fay.

Letterman would probably acknowledge his debt to Fred Allen too, but most people wouldn't know who he was talking about.

But we all come from somewhere.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Airline doesn't permit free range children -- and that's a problem?

Meet the Kulesza family: Julie, Gerry and three year old Elly.

They got on an airplane in Florida 10 days ago -- on Sunday, January 14 -- expecting to fly to their home in Boston.

Before any plane can take off, all passengers must be seated in their own seats with seat belts fastened. But Elly didn't want to sit in her seat. According to the AP story reported in this morning's Chicago Tribune, Elly "was climbing under the seat and hitting the parents and wouldn't get in her seat." An ABC News story reports that Elly had behaved well on the flight to Florida -- but when she got on the airplane to go home Elly "began to cry uncontrollably... throwing a temper tantrum on the floor."

The parents couldn't (or wouldn't) get the child under control and eventually, the plane already having been delayed 15 minutes by the hysterical toddler, the crew decided to remove the family.

They got kicked off the plane.

Now any parent can recall a time when his or her child has misbehaved in public. We can all sympathize with the parents, who surely must be mortified at their daughter's terrible behavior -- oh, wait, never mind.

This story is in the news today because the parents are angry. At the airline! Even though AirTran Airways flew the family home the next day. Even though they reimbursed the family for the cost of the tickets they bought on the flight they didn't take because of Elly's behavior. Even though they were even offered free round trip tickets to anywhere AirTran flies.

No! The airline is at fault because, quoting Julie Kluesza in the AP story, "We weren't given an opportunity to hold her, console her or anything."

In unrelated news, Democrat Sally Lieber of San Francisco, a California legislator recently proposed a law in that State that would outlaw the spanking of any child "three years old or younger and carry a possible penalty of jail time or a 1,000-dollar fine." The AFP story reported January 19 on Yahoo! News quotes the sponsor of the proposed legislation as saying the law would be written to ban "any striking of a child, any corporal punishment, smacking, hitting, punching, any of that."

Or are these stories unrelated?

The Kuleszas could not have had Rep. Lieber's anti-spanking legislation in mind on January 14 as they let their child block the aisle in the airplane, waiting for her tantrum to blow over. But one can not help but speculate that the child was not brought under control because little, if any, effort was made to bring her under control. (In my view, pleas like, "Now Elly, Elly, this isn't the right way to behave, dear..." do not count as a legitimate effort.)

Now not even I would punch a three year old child. (Do I really have to offer that disclaimer?) But wouldn't you think Mom or Dad would have hoisted the child by scruff of her neck, plopped her in her seat and gotten in her face and told her to behave herself? (I might assured her that it was a very long walk from Florida to Boston, but I'm an old grouch.)

The Kuleszas said that unlike the AirTran crew, the passengers on the flight were sympathetic to their situation.

The Kulesza say that their fellow passengers seemed sympathetic. From the ABC News story:
"I jokingly turned around and asked the three gentlemen behind me, 'Aren't you glad you got these seats?" Julie said. "Another passenger offered up a lollipop to try and calm her down."
I can only imagine what kind of medication had been spread on the lollipop before it was tendered.

And it's possible that the Kuleszas might have gotten some dirty looks or sniffs or harrumphs from their fellow passengers if they had acted like parents and made their child behave. I might have cheered and cringed at the same time: No one would want to have to discipline their child in public like that and -- at that time -- before the Kuleszas made their media rounds, I would have felt sorry for them.

But is that what parenting has come to these days? Spanking is a crime and demanding that you control your child offensive? Am I that far out of touch already?

I'll hang up and wait for your answers.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Looking at the books and what's left over when you've gone

There were four of us when we set up shop here at this Undisclosed Location, four solo practitioners. I've mentioned here, I know, that we're down to three. But I didn't write about how it happened, or when, I've just mentioned it in passing.

The man who died was our ringleader, the one who herded us into this move -- he didn't force us, mind you, because we had to go somewhere -- and we -- certainly I -- wanted as many of us to stay together as possible. But if the four of us who came here were equals, this man was primus inter pares, "first among equals," an appellation he would have particularly appreciated. He would quiz me on my (increasingly weak) Latin vocabulary from time to time. I usually failed the tests -- but passed often enough that he kept posing new ones.

My association with this man was relatively brief, only a few years. He taught part-time for decades at the law school I attended, since before the time I was a student there -- but I never took his class. I was hopeful though that we'd be able to use that law school connection to put together something here -- get in on the ground floor of the providing end of MCLE after it was imposed on us in Illinois.

(MCLE stands for "Minimum Continuing Legal Education," if you're talking to the Supreme Court -- "Mandatory Continuing Legal Education if you're talking to anyone else.)

And this man was a tax lawyer, not a litigator. He had a healthy roster of clients and he turned away a lot litigation work, or farmed it out. And I'm a litigator. Can you say "synergy?"

So I had hopes. And then he died. So I was disappointed professionally as well as saddened personally.

I can't say I knew the man well. I knew he'd battled some inner demons. I knew he'd never recovered from a bitter divorce. I knew he was estranged from his children. But I didn't know the details. Things like these are usually revealed in the fullness of time.

But not this time.

Since June we've been watching his operation wind down. Another lawyer was named executor of his estate. She'd maintained relationships with my colleague's ex-wife and children; she got them all involved in the process of winding down his business. This is one reason, however, why things have moved so slowly. When my parents died I got to know them a little better, I suppose, in looking through their stuff. But my colleague's daughters weren't just going through their father's things. They were literally getting reaccquainted with their father. And they are so young. One is a college student, the other had just graduated from high school when her father died.

So the process has been slow. Healthy, I think, but slow.

In due course active files were reassigned to new counsel. Closed files have been called back from the warehouse, box after box, and returned to the clients whenever they could be found.

And now there are 15 or 16 bankers' boxes outside my office door, boxes of other things that my colleague had seen fit to store.

Books. The boxes are full of books. History books, some stuff on tax law, and a lot of religious books. Works on theology. Books my colleague couldn't continue to keep in his home when he moved to smaller quarters after his divorce -- but stuff he couldn't part with either.

His ex-wife took what she wanted; his daughters have done the same. We've been invited to take what we want. The family doesn't want to sell the books or throw them out. They want good homes for these books; they believe that's what my colleague would have wanted. Becuase of the subject matter, I've asked my pastor if his order would be interested (he believes they will be). And I am sure it will work out for the books; they won't be discarded. They will be placed.

But -- are these books all that's left over now that my colleague is gone? He was not a big part of his daughters' lives -- for whatever reason. Multiple reasons, no doubt.

This was what I thought about this morning, when I dropped Younger Daughter off at school and headed down here for another busy (read: largely non-blogging) day. It's not the things we leave behind that matter at all; it's the people we've shaped.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Monday, January 22, 2007

Da Bears -- and how The Curmudgeon lost a nickel yesterday

Oldest Son would rate a seat at this table.

He may be the most fanatic Bear fan around. And he likes to gamble. I've mentioned how I recently had to deposit a check for him when he closed out his on line poker account.

It's not that I have anything against gambling. If you want to throw your money away in a casino, I figure it's your business. If the casino pays taxes to a jurisdiction in which I live, so much the better.

I don't gamble much because I'm not good at it. I am rational enough to believe that no one is really "good" at gambling: The house wins in the end.

But Oldest Son sees an element of skill in poker -- and in betting on sporting events.

I was having a conversation with him last week, before the game. Our conversations take place on line, via AIM. I type complete sentences and attempt to use proper grammar and spelling. All of my children find this hilarious.

Anyway, he favored me with his prediction for yesterday's game: Bears by at least 10.

Fine, I typed back, I'll take the Saints and 11. Here, I thought, was a chance to show the boy up: Gamble with your heart, be a Superfan, I thought. Maybe I can teach him a lesson.

My jumping at his exuberant prediction did catch Oldest Son a little by surprise: He waffled just a bit -- the Bears were favored by no more than three on any line -- but ultimately gave me the Saints and 9.5.

Then the question was the stake.

Because I am ordinarily an abject failure as a gambler, I have learned that, when I take the plunge, it must be for low stakes. I usually go for a penny.

That's not gambling jargon. That's a coin with Lincoln on it.

But -- in this instance -- where I had trapped Oldest Son into an irrational bet, I went all out. I went up to a nickel.

Again, we are not talking gambling jargon of any sort. This refers to a coin bearing Jefferson's image..

I am quite certain that Oldest Son realized, by my venturing into such high stakes territory, just how serious I was.

And, of course, I lost.

He called to gloat within a few minutes of the end of the game, too. My nickel is in the mail today.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Super Bowl XLI and the complications of young love

Bear down, Chicago Bears,
make every play clear the way to victory;

Bear down, Chicago Bears,
put up a fight with a might so fearlessly.

We'll never forget the way you thrilled the nation
with your T-formation.

Bear down, Chicago Bears,
and let them know why you're wearing the crown.

You're the pride and joy of Illinois,
Chicago Bears, bear down.

We may have been singing the familiar Al Hoffman lyric (above) earlier this evening. At one point in his stubborn young life, Oldest Son insisted that I had made up this song; he didn't believe it was real. That was a long time ago....

Right now, we're pretty happy here... even though I lost a nickel on the game.

But, you know, life just got more complicated for Older Daughter. I mean, she lives in Indianapolis. Her boyfriend is a huge Colts fan. And she will be forced to choose.

No, it won't be quite as public as it was for Brady Quinn's sister in the 2006 Fiesta Bowl... but it will be difficult for Older Daughter nonetheless. Oldest Son has already started the email duel with Older Daughter's boyfriend.

Let the hype begin.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

From the Mailbag: Fill 'er up!

OK, this wasn't actually sent to me as The Curmudgeon, but I did get it in an email... and I think these images are both remarkable and worth sharing.

See if you agree.













It is amazing that this can be done. It is even more amazing that -- on some level -- this is a matter of routine.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Friday, January 19, 2007

Lynn Johnston's just teasing us -- isn't she?

Now that Liz has dumped Paul the two-timing cop, she's just going to settle for Anthony. On the double rebound, no less.

Or does Warren really have a chance?

Do we dare hope?
id= Stumble It!

The Bears' Super Bowl Shuffle

A true blast from the past. I have the record -- in all its actual vinyl, 33⅓ RPM glory -- at home in the basement. If the Bears actually win Sunday, maybe they'll reissue it on CD. Or this video on DVD.

Watch this now. Dancing is optional, especially if you're at work.


id= Stumble It!

How to argue a motion -- Part One

No, this is not my picture. But I was looking for something
authoritative here.
And this is the second most famous
lawyer ever to come out of Illinois.
(The most famous
lawyer to come out of Illinois has his picture on the $5 bill.)
Do you know who this second most famous Illinois lawyer is?
Answer below.


And now our little seminar, presented as an annotated colloquy:
The young lawyer had prepared an excellent brief in support of the pending motion and the senior partners have decided the young lawyer was "ready" to appear in court and argue the motion alone. "Flying solo," the partners called it. Also, one had a lunch appointment with a client and the other had a 1:00 pm tee time. The golfing partner had signed the brief, so the firm was "covered" with the client.

The magic moment arrived: The young lawyer stepped up to the bench, and began, "Good afternoon, Your Honor."

The young lawyer may have had a riveting 10 minute argument carefully scripted. But if the judge interrupts there is only one thing to do: Shut up.

The learned judge can surely argue your case better than you, the young lawyer. At least so far as the learned judge is concerned -- and that's the most important thing right now, isn't it? If the judge wants to talk, let him talk.

The judge (who may have a tee time too, you know) cuts off the argument at "Good afternoon," and turns to opposing counsel.

"Counsel, your opponent cites five Illinois Supreme Court cases in his brief that appear to be right on point. What do you say to this?"

"Well, your honor, my young friend here has left out the Smith case which surely is the leading case on this issue. There must be hundreds of cases that follow it. Smith states the rule -- and counsel has merely cited the exceptions to the rule."
It is bad form at this point to turn red in the face and jump up and down and say that your learned opponent is making Smith and its progeny up out of whole cloth. Even though you are certain that this is so. Even if it is so. Shouting "liar, liar, pants on fire!" is almost a sure method of pushing the court into following "Smith."

If the attorney "citing" Smith has enough gray hair, the court will be inclined to follow Smith anyway. Right down the primrose path.

Do not condemn the learned judge. There is a reason why we call it the practice of law: We never know it all. But there is reason to believe that the older lawyer should know more than the younger one.

I remember once asking a clerk to research an issue. I knew a starting point and I gave the clerk the case citation. But I knew there had been changes in the law and I couldn't remember what the current case was. If I'd remembered that I wouldn't have needed the clerk's help.

What I received in return, however, was a very scholarly memo tracing of the legal principle in the case I'd provided, all the way back to the Statutes of Henry II.

Or darn near.

What I didn't get was the case that had since abandoned the point of law in the case I'd provided to the clerk -- the case that I dimly recollected to be out there, lurking in the legal shadows.

I suspect that everyone who has been around long enough has at least one story like this. The clerk, a law student, had taken an academic -- law school -- approach to the question when I wanted a lawyer's approach: I want a case that will impress the judge. What will impress the judge is a case that provides the court with reassurance that he or she will not be reveresed if my argument is accepted. Preferably a case decided in the last five minutes, so that it is unlikely that the Appellate Court has not yet changed its mind.

What will not impress the judge is a learned treatise tracing the principle of law back to when case diverged from assumpsit. Indeed the judge may be angry with the lawyer for dredging up traumatic law school memories. And, besides, there are often page limits to consider.

If you've read anything in this blog you will have arrived at the conclusion that I can be a trifle, uh, long-winded. It is an occupational hazard. Mary Anne, of A Place I call Home, is running a little contest this week, looking for "dental horror stories". She's asked for entries of 250 words or less. Lawyers can't say "good morning" in less than 250 words.

Well, maybe I just did -- but you understand the point.

But back to our annotated colloquy: How do we get the judge to realize that the Smith case is a fabrication, whole and entire? We've eliminated "liar, liar, pants on fire" as an appropriate rejoinder. So I would suggest this instead:
"Your Honor, I must admit that I am unfamiliar with this Smith case. I did not come across Smith in my resarch on this motion, or indeed any reference to Smith. It isn't mentioned in any of the five cases I've cited and I would have thought that the court would have acknowledged a rule if it was carving out an exception. Perhaps counsel could give me the citation so that I can examine the case...."
Two things here: First, never ask opposing counsel anything directly. That's not being rude to counsel, it is proper etiquette in court. Second, our young lawyer is taking advantage of youth and inexperience, turning the judge into a mentor.

And, of course, the young lawyer has in fact said "liar, liar, pants on fire" -- but not in a way that embarrasses the court.

This is particularly important if the learned judge plays golf or plays cards with your opponent.
So the judge looks to the young lawyer's opponent and says, "What is the citation to Smith again? I can't remember myself."
A lifeline is being extended here. The learned judge may now suspect that counsel is imagining Smith and he or she is giving counsel a chance to say that he can't remember the citation either. With luck, the court will now take the motion under advisement, and in due course issue an order granting the young lawyer's motion.

Sometimes, wary of this trap, unwilling to be called out on a Smith or Jones case that does not and never has existed, counsel will instead say, "So my young friend here has cited five cases. But there are lots of cases that say the opposite."

No Smith corner in which to be painted.

But the response is still the same: Play on the court's paternal or maternal feelings toward you, the young lawyer, and ask the court to ask counsel for any of those cases. Any of them. So that you can read and grow and learn.

And thereby call out the old fogey just the same.

But one final bit of advice: Don't gloat. Someday, you'll have the gray hair.

-------------------------------------------------------

Quiz Answer: Clarance Darrow. But you all knew that, didn't you?

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Triple dog dared

Barb, of Skittles' Place, posted an underwear quiz on her blog yesterday... and I declined to participate. But I left a comment saying so.

That was a mistake.

Barb thereafter left a comment over here as follows: "I TRIPLE DOG DARE you to do that underwear quiz AND post it on your blog!"

Well, as everyone knows, at least those who know the movie from which the above photograph is taken, the triple dog dare is not something that can be taken lightly. Still, it was just in a comment here, and maybe not all the kids on the playground heard it... but no! When I went over to Skittles' Place this morning, I found this post at the top of her page.

Now all the kids on the playground know and honor is truly at stake.

On the other hand, look what happened to poor Flick when he accepted his challenge. I don't want to wind up like him.

So I have tried to find a middle ground and, after pulling out tufts of hair I can ill afford to lose, I think I have....

Barb, I took the test. Honest, I did. And I've posted the quiz here, via a link back to you.

The bell's ringing, Barb, we have to get back to class!

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Thursday, January 18, 2007

From the mailbag

Not too long ago, I installed an email link in the Sidebar. All the cool kids seemed to have one, I noticed, so I wanted one too.

But, what to do with it? Well, there are weak jokes that I can make above the link which I'll change from time to time. The book contract remark is very weak; it'll be gone soon enough.

I know what I can't do with the mailbox: I will not ever solicit or respond to inquiries made specific legal services. Not that anyone reading this blog would do so silly a thing. I'm anonymous. I couldn't possibly help you, even if you were from Chicago where I live and practice. And my license ends at the borders of the State of Illinois.

So here's what I'm going to do. I'll share some of the things I get from time to time. If there's an idea or a topic you'd like me to discuss, I'm open to suggestion. I make no promises, warranties or guarantees of any kind, either to respond or about the responses I may make. All letters to The Curmudgeon are mine to do with as I please; if I do run with an idea you give me I will be pleased to provide attribution (unless, of course, you request otherwise).

Back in college, when we had a hole on a page and it was the wee small hours of the morning and the paper had to be at the printer by dawn in order to get distributed, sometimes we'd make up a letter to the editor. Or two. We were thouroughly versed in Monty Python. Sometimes one imaginary letter to the editor would respond to the one preceding -- a neat trick if both hadn't been made up entirely. I'm not promising not to make up letters if it suits me. Although I'm pretty lazy... and besides, I have great material to work with -- like this:

Royal Circus Casino - $777 Welcome Bonus !

Join now one of the best online casinos in the world :
* Over 45 advanced games .
* Huge Jackpots .
* Ongoing Comps .
* 24/7 Customer Support .
* Quick Download.
I feel very special to receive an invitation like this. Although I'd rather they just sent me the $777. Perhaps if I installed Paypal.... And then there was this email:

Dear Sir,

Have a nice day

MainMold is a manufacturer , supplying products for plastic flat sheets that have many colors and sizes .

Material:ABS , PS , PP, H.D.P.E. PVC. PET

Dimension: 1250mm*650mm

800mm*440mm

1220mm*610mm

~1500mm*3000mm

Thickness:0.25mm~30mm

We welcome your inquiries and it's our honor to provide quotations. Kindly send your models and we will reply ASAP.

Best regards,

Avy Chen

MainMold Technology Co., Ltd.

No.1 , Lane 476, HuaCheng Rd,

Sinjhuang City 242, Taipei County,

Taiwan.

Clearly this blog is starting to have a global reach -- and if I can ever think of a use for flat plastic sheets in my life, I now know exactly where to go. And if you order your flat plastic sheets there, be sure to mention my name; maybe I'll get a commission.

But my current favorite email has to be this one:
In confidence / Marcel

Hello Dear,

I am Mr Marcel Kuma from
sierra leone but residing in Ivory Coast in Africa. It is my desire to contact you on honesty and sincerity to assist me in transferring the sum of $8,000,000(Eight Million United States Dollars) inherited from my father late Mr. Kuma to your country for investment. I am motivated in contacting you and hope to gradually build trust, relationship and confidence in you as I get to know you better.

So please I want to know if you will be of assistance but first I want to get to know you better. I am willing to offer you $1,600,000(One Million Six Hundred Thousand
United States Dollars) for your effort input after the successful transfer of this money and investment. Indicate your interest towards assisting me by sending your phone # and address so that I can communicate with you at any time. I will be waiting for your response.

Thanks
Marcel
Marcel will continue to wait a long time. Poor man.

However, what a nice salutation -- "Hello Dear." If I were to respond, I suppose I should have to start my letter, "Hello Snookums." I don't know how we could fail to "build trust, relationship and confidence" if we start speaking to one another like this.

At least this letter is shorter than most of them.

Labels: , ,

id= Stumble It!

Excuse me, I have to clean up a bit after the party

Ah, but wasn't it grand while it lasted?

While I'm emptying the ashtrays, sing amongst yourselves:

The Party's Over (from the 1956 musical Bells Are Ringing)
music by Jule Styne & lyrics by Adolph Green and Betty Comden

The Party's Over, it's time to call it a day.
They've burst your pretty balloon and taken the moon away.

It's time to wind up the masquerade.
Just make your mind up the piper must be paid.

The Party's Over. The candles ficker and dim.
You danced and dreamed through the night,
it seemed to be right just being with him.

Now you must wake up, all dreams must end.
Take off your make up, The Party's Over.
It's all over, my friend.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Problem solving 101

From this morning's Quick Takes column in the Chicago Sun-Times:
The British secretary of state for education has responded to failures of British schools to meet standards in regular national curriculum tests of schoolchildren by announcing that regular national curriculum tests of schoolchildren will be discontinued.
That's what we need in our public servants! See a problem -- and sweep it right under the rug devise a solution.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Thank you, thank you -- why is the orchestra playing so loud already?

And I don't even have one of those music widgets on this thing!



It's probably a good thing the music is so loud, because otherwise I'd give you a speech like Sally Field did at the Oscars.

Although I tend to remember Ms. Field as Sister Bertrille:

Today seems to have a "nun theme" here at Second Effort (for another example, see updated post below). Maybe it's because every time I see "Bestest Blog" I think of what Sr. Lucilla would have said about the word "bestest." It would not have been pretty, folks; you may trust me on this.

In the meantime, my Google ads are really going to be different for a couple of days, aren't they?
id= Stumble It!

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

The sign is still there

As of a few minutes ago, the big "Go Bears/praytostjude.org" sign is still up outside the Claretian Publications Building on West Monroe. I wasn't sure it would be.

I mean, it was one thing when the Bears were playing the Seahawks. But on Sunday -- it's the Saints.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Update -- January 17

A new visitor, "The Awkward Epiphany," left this comment: "Do you think the Saints have a monopoly on the spirits of all past saints?"

Well... no. It may have been a weak attempt at humor, but I'm not the only one having some fun with this.

Sneed's column, in this morning's Chicago Sun-Times quotes our own "pigskin prognosticator extraordinaire," Sr. Jean Kenny (a Sister of Providence if you keep track of these sorts of things) as predicting:

"Blustery Bears sideline Saints (even on a Sunday) 27-24."


Now, if Sr. Jean can make this little joke, so can I.

Twice now.
id= Stumble It!

The gender of the Blogosphere -- an Unscientific Survey

Long Suffering Spouse teaches Spanish to junior high students and one of the most difficult concepts they struggle with -- year after year -- is that every noun in Spanish has a gender.

*WARNING* I am about to attempt an illustration of this point. Native Spanish speakers in particular, be ready to cringe. *YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED* Thus, it is el gato, the cat, male in gender, even when the cat is female.

I didn't understand it either when I took Spanish.

But thinking about that led me to think about the 'gender' of the Blogosphere. Saturday I joked in my bloghopping post about experiencing a sex change operation... because the person who bloghopped me referred to me as a "she" (is that too many pronouns?) in her blog. On the other hand, at first blush, it seemed a safe assumption.

Women write most of the blogs I visit regularly. Not all of them, of course. There's Captain Picard and Dr. A, Chris from Thermal,and Ben and Bennie. And of course Sarge -- but he fell into the habit because of his blogging bride Bee. I believe that to be true of Barb of the blockbuster blog (say that 10 times fast -- g'wan now, I dare you!) Skittles and her husband Mike. And then there's professional comedy writer and sometime baseball announcer Ken Levine. Or Josh, "The Comics Curmudgeon".

I've lost you now among the exceptions, haven't I? We lawyers tend to do that.

But most of the blogs on my blogroll are written by women. And there's a huge community of popular "mommy blogs" such as Suburban Turmoil.

Indeed, I was prepared to state this morning unequivocally that the gender of the Blogosphere should be feminine... I was going to argue that the women are so dominant here that our miniscule male presence can be ignored entirely which is why the women feel so free to speak their minds... on any and every topic... and using any words they feel like using. I was going to cite some of the comments I've been reading... anything by Mist1... oh, I had a dandy post taking shape as I was coming to work this morning on the train.

And then I opened my email. And saw my Sitemeter stats for the week.

I had 531 hits this week -- 76 a day.

Paltry figures, to be sure, next to Barb's 442 -- but, put it this way -- since I first started tracking with Sitemeter, I've had about 3,900 hits total. This week represents over 13.6% of that entire total.

This latest upsurge in traffic is due, without question, to Sgt. Michelle Manhart, USAF. My post about her appeared January 12. Traffic shot up on January 13. And I had only one AP photo with my post... not the pictures that ran in Playboy.

Now, none of these new visitors left comments. They presumably were disappointed quickly and left. But my suspicion is that all (nearly all?) the Google searches for Sgt. Manhart were from males.

And I realize there are a lot more male bloggers out there doing political blogs.

I've mostly shied away from politics here. It's not that I don't have opinions. I have lots of them... but here I'm trying to attract readers. I'd accept acolytes, of course, but my wife would not allow me to have any groupies. So I want readers -- and political opinions tend to put off potential readers.

Besides, my red meat conservative acquaintances think I'm a Commie Pinko hippie radical freak. My true believer liberal acquaintances think I'm a heartless souless running dog reactionary. I'm afraid that may make me... middle of the road.

And you know what you're most likely to find in the middle of the road, don't you?

Road kill.

No, I'll continue to steer clear of politics.

But there are men are out there in the Blogosphere. And they're certainly running Google searches. (On the topic of searches, Ken Levine's Sunday linkbaiting post is more shameless than anything I've ever done. And funnier, of course. Although he left out Sgt. Manhart. And Chrissy Popadics. I'll have to leave him a comment on that....)

But in the meantime, I'll leave you with my irregular feature, the Unscientific Survey: What gender do you assign to the Blogosphere? Feel free to explain your answers.

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

Monday, January 15, 2007

No joke: Germans only following orders when they veer off the highways

Some people find ethnic humor very offensive. Perhaps you have been scolded for resorting to this sort of humor in the past. I have been scolded on occasion myself. And I have learned: Just because someone is German, for example, does not mean he will blindly follow orders.

So I will present this news story, posted on Yahoo! News without comment:

BERLIN (Reuters) - A 46-year-old German motorist driving along a busy road suddenly veered to the left and ended up stuck on a railway track -- because his satellite navigation system told him to, police said on Sunday.

The motorist was heading into the north German city of Bremen "when the friendly voice from his satnav told him to turn left," a spokesman said.

"He did what he was ordered to do and turned his Audi left up over the curb and onto the track of a local streetcar line. He tried to back up off the track but got completely stuck."

The police spokesman said about a dozen trams were held up until a tow lorry arrived to clear the car off the track.

Several German motorists have crashed their cars in recent months, later telling police they were only obeying orders from their satnavs.
Must remain politically correct.... still trying not to comment....

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Oldest Son went to the Bears game...

Photograph acquired from the Chicago Tribune website.

I'd try to explain the various machinations he went through, buying tickets from StubHub! and selling them on eBay through the good offices of a "power seller" of his acquaintance... and then obtaining four better seats and selling two of these... but during his explanation my head began to pound and I could no longer pay attention.

The bottom line: Yesterday was the first time Oldest Son made it to a Bears game.

It wasn't supposed to be that way.

In December 1997 the Bears were terrible, the weather was worse, and there was no hope of a playoff berth. One of my partners had season tickets... and no intentions of going to the last home game.

StubHub! hadn't been invented yet, and I don't believe eBay had either. Season ticket holders would try to peddle their extra tickets to friends and family... but, when all else failed, they'd give them away.

This was where my partner found himself in December 1997: He'd paid for the tickets. He wouldn't use them. He'd tried and failed to sell them. He hated to see them go entirely to waste. So he asked if I would take them off his hands.

I took the tickets.

There is a tipping point in these transactions and my partner had crossed it: By the time he asked me, I was doing him a favor by taking these ducats free, gratis and for nothing. I wouldn't have taken them otherwise.

The great day arrived and Oldest Son, Middle Son and I set off for the game. The plan was to park by my office (I had access to a free parking space at that time) and then take the subway down toward Soldier Field. When we got to the office, we went inside, just for a minute, to let the kids use the necessary. I fussed around the office for a couple of minutes. There's always something to look at.

In 1997 I had a cell phone. But I didn't carry it all the time. I saw no point in carrying it to a football game in crumby weather where I wouldn't hear it anyway and I might lose it. So I didn't have it with me that day.

The flashing light on the office phone told me there were messages. I played them back.

One was from Long Suffering Spouse.

My mother had been in the hospital for cancer surgery. She was recuperating normally, we were told. But, I thought, trying, but unable to banish the thought away, perhaps something had happened. Long Suffering Spouse's message was that I should call home right away. She sounded upset.

I finished the messages and made ready to dial home.

Middle Son and Oldest Son had probably completed their business and were getting fidgety, ready to leave. Excited. But I told them that Mom had called and asked them to bear with me a moment. I placed the call.

"Your mother's had a heart attack," LSS told me, without preliminaries. "They don't know how long she has and you'd better get back here."

So we went back home. The boys didn't get to go to their game. I went to the hospital.

My mother survived another 2½ years -- spending most of that time in the hospital -- at least the way I remember it. I used to tease her that she spent more time in the hospital than a Soviet leader while the succession was being worked out.

Middle Son has been to lots of Bears games over the past two years... as an usher. My late father was a great football fan. But, yesterday, when Oldest Son was so excited to go to his first Bears game, it was my mother I thought about.

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Bloghopping... sort of

A little over a week ago Rose DesRochers left a comment on my junk mail post and added that she was out "bloghopping." I was invited to hop on over to her site and where else she'd gone.

I couldn't do that right away -- for one thing the link to her Blogger ID did not link to her blog. But I found her... on Thermal I believe... and that's how I have an active link to her site here.

Incidentally, this may be the 17th plug I've given Chris already this year. I'm going to have to start charging....

Herewith a link to Rose'sbloghopping post. When I got there I found out that I'd undergone a sex change operation. But Rose said something nice about this post so all was forgiven. Besides, the effects do not seem to be permanent.

Now you might think, if I was going to try this bloghopping thing for myself, I'd start with Rose. Turnabout and fair play and all. But, no, that's just what they'd want you to think, wouldn't they? So I'll say instead that I enjoyed Rose's I'm going to be a Grandmother post and start this bloghopping adventure instead with...

... Lawfrog of Toadally Talking because of the hopping and frog and the --

Look. If I have to explain everything, we'll get nowhere, OK?

Anyway, Lawfrog is a lawyer who's just quit her job. So she's got a lot on her mind and I'm sure a lot more to come on her blog.

Now the rules of this game, as I understand them, are you start at one blog... and then hop into the blogroll at random.

Yeah, right. I'm going to look and see what's most interesting.

Hmmmmmm. East of Oregon... Doctor Anonymous.... I can't fault Lawfrog's selections here. *looking, looking* What's this? Second Effort? *blush* *brief detour to reciprocate with a link on my page*

So I click on most of the links available to pages I don't know. Looking for just the "right" one that will lead to an amazing adventure in the Blogosphere. This lead to clicking from some of those links, trying to see how this would work. I wound up at a Google video called Bikini Calculus. I had to watch, didn't I?

At the end, it offered me a link to post it here... and I did think about it... and then I thought Bee would probably figure I was only doing it to increase Sitemeter hits... although I've already used the word "bikini" twice now so I've probably got the Sitemeter buzzing anyway. My real concern is that I don't remember enough calculus to know whether they were really providing good information. I have my credibility to consider. (You believe that, don't you?)

In any event, now that I've provided the link, Chris will probably have it on Thermal next week. And there's more than one video Chris! Or so I'm told... I haven't really looked. (And that's 18!)

But this bloghopping thing wasn't moving along nearly as well as it should. I was still at square one. So I moved the mouse over to the links column, closed my eyes... and clicked... and came right back here.

Some of us are just not meant to hop.

Maybe I'll try some other time.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Friday, January 12, 2007

TV Stars

Ben and Bennie did just fine tonight on CNN -- tried to leave comment there but of course Blogger won't cooperate.

Maybe there's heavy traffic.

I hope it's mostly good.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Air Force sergeant photographed out of uniform

This is Staff Sgt. Michelle Manhart, USAF. According to an AP story posted today on Yahoo! News, Sgt. Manhart appears in this month's issue of Playboy magazine. According to the AP, Sgt. Manhart is in uniform in one photo, "yelling and holding weapons under the headline 'Tough Love.' The following pages show her partially clothed, wearing her dog tags while working out, as well as completely nude."

The Air Force is not amused. The AP reports that Sgt. Manhart has been "relieved of her duties while the military investigates." That presumably will involve looking at the pictures. Over and over again. Asking for the outtakes. Looking at them, too. Investigative work can be so tedious.

I can understand why the Air Force is not too happy about Sgt. Manhart's decision to pose. They've had their troubles with sexual harassment cases -- even a rape scandal -- involving the Air Force Academy in recent years. So I can understand when Oscar Balladares, Lackland Air Force Base spokesman, says "This staff sergeant's alleged action does not meet the high standards we expect of our airmen, nor does it comply with the Air Force's core values of integrity, service before self, and excellence in all we do." Although he's pre-judging the outcome of the investigation a bit isn't he? I mean, maybe the pictures do display excellence.

I understand that posing in this fashion may not be conducive to good order and discipline in the ranks. Heck, I've haven't seen the pictures and my own discipline is no longer in good order. And if there hasn't been an express ban on this sort of thing in the past, it may be a good idea to adopt a rule now.

But, in the meantime, I'm thinking that what's done is done and the Air Force might be better off just embracing the pictorial. (No, not the subject of the pictorial. Not given the Air Force's past sexual harassment issues.)

What I'm thinking about is this: Aren't recruitments down these days? Isn't this a heck of a recruiting poster? And a slogan: "Join the Air Force! We got sergants that look like this!"

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Give your child a sense of individuality -- by forcing him to wear what you want

Mary Anne from A Place I call Home responded to yesterday morning's post about hair dyeing with some thoughtful comments. An extract:
Is not part of learning to learn how to become tolerant of one's differneces? Is that not part of education? Should we squash someones creativity because another person does not see it as being educational? What about art class, do we not promote creativity? Encourage individuality?


And this got me thinking. About indviduality... and I was already thinking about hair dye... and that led me to think about what kids wear.

When I was in high school, a generation ago, dress codes were toppling all over the country, often as the result of court challenges. We would now be "free" to express our individuality in how we dressed.

But what really happened is that we dressed according to new dress codes: the unwritten, ever-changing and often merciless code of whatever our "group" was. Jocks dressed like jocks. Freaks dressed like freaks...

...although no high school kid ever grew a beard like this. Ever. Except in his own imagination.

Greasers dressed like greasers. Straights dressed like straights.

By the way, "straight" had nothing to do with gender preference in those days. Good heavens: In those days, "gay" meant happy.

I had a high school classmate named Gay.

So the language has changed. And so have the names of at least some of the groups. Maybe you went to school with Goths, Nerds, or Preps -- but the tyranny of the group over a kid's clothing choices has remained constant through the years.

The pendulum started to swing back in favor of dress codes when educators and, still later, courts began to realize that street gangs also had dress codes. Wearing the wrong sweater in the wrong school prove a fatal fashion faux pas. Quite literally. Many Chicago schools have dress codes now... and gangs have adapted by coopting the uniforms, in at least some cases, into their own "colors."

But that's a different story.

So here's my hypothesis: I think that kids don't develop or express their individuality in their clothing choices, if they're allowed to make these choices entirely "on their own." Because they won't make them on their own. They will instead make only those "choices" consistent with their group ethos.

So I suggest, if you want your child to develop a sense of individuality, dictate your kids' clothing choices to the extent you possibly can. While that sounds contradictory, the teenager who's not allowed to wear the "right" brand of jeans must develop a sense of individuality in order to withstand the scorn of his or her group. What are they supposed to do? Blame it on their parents? "My Mom made we wear these" will only work in the short term, if at all. Eventually the group will ostracize the child... unless the child persuades the group that these khakis, or the shirt with a collar, is really his own "personal" style.

Sounds like a dream doesn't it? And, if we're talking shirts with actual collars, it probably is.

And that's another reason why I like school uniforms. But I've already blogged about that.

---------------------------------------------------------------

It's going to be a busy day here at the Undisclosed Location, so I'm going to sign off now and probably not get back here the rest of the day.

Not even to check the Sitemeter. (Beads of perspiration already beginning to form....)

I can check the email for comments, though, can't I? (Hands starting to shake just a bit....)
id= Stumble It!

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Tagged by Skittles

Barb is calling this the "Thinking Meme." But these look an awful lot like beauty contest questions to me.

I'm terrible with beauty contest questions... however, for Barb, I'll try. But I'm going to be all over the board on these....

1. If you had to choose one vice in exclusion of all others what would it be?
Right away, a tough one. See, I have so many that it's hard to choose. And that's after having already given up so many.

But if I could take an occasional wee dram of something warm, that wouldn't be so bad, would it?

And that's "Blue Label" in the background. I'd like to acquire a taste for that. Heck, I'd like to acquire a single bottle of Blue Label... but that's going to be some time in the distant future, I'm afraid.

2. If you could change one specific thing about the world what would it be?
I'd make cars run on seawater instead of gasoline. When you think of all the changes that would follow from that one, you'll see I'm serious....

But I'll get over it as soon as we get to the next question.
3. Name the cartoon character you identify with the most.
This is another toughie.

There's a resemblance here. But I'm no hunter.

There's a resemblance here as well. Although my eyesight is a little better....

But this is either my Communion picture or Alfred E. Neuman.

And if I can't tell which, I'm guessing this
must be the cartoon character I most resemble.
4. If you could live one day in your life over again which one would it be?
I'd pick a day on which I received a big check. Live it over and over again for a month. Maybe two months. And then retire. The checks would cumulate, right?
5. If you could go back in history and spend a day with one person who would it be?
Only a day? That doesn't seem fair. And only one person? I'd like to be with Lincoln the day he visited Richmond. I'd like to be with Washington at Fraunces Tavern.

I'd like to hang out with Julius Caesar... any day but March 15, 44 B.C. I'd like to spend a night at the White House when Churchill was visiting FDR.

I wish I could have been with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on July 20, 1969. I was there in a sense, watching TV, but I mean really, truly there with them. That would require some revision of history and equipment, however.

But if I get only one person, and only one day, I suppose I'd have to ask for a good seat at the Sermon on the Mount.

I'm not partial to fish, but when they passed the bread around after, I'd take some to be sociable.
6. What is the one thing you lost, sold or threw away that you wish you could have back?
I wish my mother hadn't thrown out my baseball cards. But they probably weren't in near as good shape as I remember them now. I can still smell the bubble gum. And I regret that my aunt got rid of all the Lego I'd accumulated as a kid. It wasn't all kits then and I think my kids would have enjoyed it more. (I know I would have.)
7. What is your one most important contribution to this world?
Barb said it best: Her children.

Not that her children are my most important contribution. No. No. That's not what I mean.

Well, you know what I mean.... don't you?
8. What is your one hidden talent that nearly no one knows about?
Please. This is the Blogosphere. What's hidden?
9. What is your most cherished possession?
I'd like to be "deep" and say something like 'possessions aren't important to me.' I'd be lying, of course.... I suppose I'd have to say my law license. Without it, we don't eat.
10. What one person influenced your life the most when growing up?
Finally! An easy one!

I watched Bozo every day -- heck, my mother watched the show long after we kids were grown up and out of the house.

Or maybe this guy -- Frazier Thomas -- the Prime Minister to Garfield Goose, King of the United States.

Oh, wait, I'm kind of imitating the Bill Murray routine from Scrooged, aren't I?

No, my parents were the biggest influence on me. That's probably true for most people, for better or for worse. In my case it was largely for the better. This question should probably be amended to exclude parents....
11. What one word describes you better than any other?
Cowardly?
Cheap?
Boring?
Insufferable? (And, no, I'm not opening this to a poll!)
No, in the end, I think I'll go with "curmudgeonly."
Kind of ties in with the blog, anyway.
Under the rules of meme-ing -- and there's a word I'd challenge at Scrabble -- I'm supposed to tag some other suckers unsuspecting victims innocent bystanders.

With no malice aforethought, and without meaning to impose any obligation whatsoever, I'll tag Bennie, of the tag team of Ben & Bennie; Susan, of stuff and nonsense; Sari, of The Geek Inside; Shel, of Musings of a Phenomenal Webmistress; and Sarge, of Sarge Charlie. I don't think any of the aforementioned have been overly burdened with memes of late... I think Sarge may be looking for a break from the vacation stories anyway.

Anyone else who wants to wade into this voluntarily, please feel free to do so. And if you wished I'd tagged you, please let me know! I may need victims volunteers in future.

Labels:

Skittles">id= Stumble It!

A hair-raising issue -- or -- dyeing to get out of school

The on-line version of Stefano Esposito's story in this morning's Chicago Sun-Times is not illustrated. The photo which accompanied the story in the actual paper paper is too small to reproduce usefully here. It shows a normal looking young teenager, with mostly brass-colored or golden tresses -- and, as the story notes, a couple of quite distinct cranberry red streaks. Herwith Esposito's article, complete and unabridged... for a reason which I'll explain:
Some might consider Sandridge School Principal Leroy Coleman a bit old-school.

The 50-something educator doesn't approve of kids holding hands in the hallways or "romancing."

Mom sides with daughter

And when seventh-grader Holli Boam arrived Wednesday with cranberry-red streaks in her hair, Coleman sent her home to wash it out. The principal at the Chicago Heights school was taken aback Wednesday when he learned that Holli and her mom weren't going to comply.

No 'romancing' either

"I'm surprised the mother would call you -- especially when we had such a wonderful conversation," Coleman told a Sun-Times reporter.

Holli's mother, April Boam, says her daughter's youthful expression of individuality doesn't violate rules.

Coleman says it's a distraction. "The best way to resolve this is to rinse out that ink -- or whatever it is."

April Boam says her daughter is being singled out. Boam points out that Coleman has sent her daughter home half a dozen times for no good reason, including for a kiss with a boy.

"The only reason they come here is to get educated," Coleman said. "I'm not having any romancing going on."

Holli says: "It's not like it's any color. It's not like it's blue or a neon-green color."
The entire article is presented to illustrate a lesson in newspaper reading. Reading this story tells me that there's some "history," mostly unpleasant, between the principal and the girl's family. And it may have at least as much -- if not more -- to do with the young girl's burgeoning interest in boys than with her interest in hair dye. Or at least with the principal's perception of what the young girl is most interested in. That's why you shouldn't take sides on almost anything you read in the newspaper based on one article alone.

But the general subject of the article, about young girls dyeing their hair, is something which all too frequently becomes an issue for parents of girls. And I do have a side to take here.

Don't allow it.

Listen to the voice of experience.

My daughters had brown hair. It would lighten a bit in the Summers -- I've since learned that there are shampoos that aren't quite dyes to enhance that normal process. I think Older Daughter's original hair may have originally been lighter than Younger Daughter's.

But I can't remember for sure.

A few years back, Older Daughter asked us if she could dye her hair. I said no... and was promptly overruled by my Long Suffering Spouse. "It's just this one time," my wife said.

But it wasn't. And Older Daughter's hair became various shades of red over the next several years. Sometimes lighter, sometimes darker, sometimes nearly orange.

I am not saying there's any addicting substance in either this hair dye or any other. I'll wait for the scientists to prove it, as I'm sure they will someday. Then I won't get sued.

But -- for whatever reason -- girls do not dye their hair once. They have to do it again and again. They have to go to other girl's houses and help them dye their hair. Other girls have to come to your house to dye your daughter's hair.

All their birthday money, their allowances, their earnings from babysitting or part-time jobs get plowed into new tubes and bottles and jars. Then there's related lotions and potions and the next thing you know, you can't get into or out of the shower in the morning.

Trust me on this.

Younger Daughter recently dyed her hair black. Coal black. Midnight black. She thought she looked like Snow White. I told her she reminded me of someone else.

Fathers can be so cruel.

And the sarcasm didn't help: The hair is still very dark.

Both daughters assured us over Christmas that their hair is returning to the colors Nature intended. Since Long Suffering Spouse is also skeptical of this claim, I feel safe in saying I don't think this is so.

So my advice to the aggrieved mother in today's story: Wash the kid's hair as often as necesary to get the "ink" out. And don't let her do it again.

If it's not already too late. And for anyone looking in for whom this has not yet been an issue... when your daughters ask...

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

It was all innocent fun... I thought... and then...

A couple of days ago I did a silly post about Internet traffic and how certain key words in posts had generated spikes in my Sitemeter statistics.

Well, not spikes, really, more like boomlets.

OK, barely perceptible ripples -- but that's beside the point. A number of you left comments suggesting other phrases I could use, or that you have used or might use, that might also cause traffic spikes.

May, from about a nurse suggested that I insert the words "naked lawyer" in a post. May, I will do no such shameless thing... or will I?

MJ, of Nurse Ratched's Place recalled that she'd once used the term "hot nurse." The many persons racing to her blog who relied on that phrase in their search argument may have been disappointed to learn that she was writing about an air conditioner malfunction. Now, I've disappointed them yet again.

Chris, of Thermal accused me of "linkbaiting" -- which sounds disreputable, surely, if not downright felonious. But, in due course, he offered a suggestion... which I won't repeat... although his comment remains available for your consideration.

Barb, from Skittles recalled that her husband, Mike, of Mike's Place, once did a "hillbilly name generator" that generated a lot of traffic. Probably from people with at least two first names each.

Ladeedah of La La Land suggested she might try phases like "ufo's abduct talking cat" and "aliens from mars kidnaps elvis."

Elvis' birthday was January 8, the same day the post in question appeared. Coincidence... or not?

I didn't think so either.

Anyway, since it was Elvis' birthday so recently, it seems appropriate to run his picture.

What? You were hoping for a "hot nurse"? Or, gulp, a "naked lawyer?" Please, I'm not that kind of blogger. (Even though Bee, of Muffin 53 -- the Empress, with her new banner and all -- called me a "sitemeter ho.")

And Susan, of stuff and nonsense, chimed in mainly because I'd run a picture of Boris Badenov and used the phrase "Moose and Squirrel."

Well, I used it again.

But, anyway, the three terms that had started all this fuss were "Chrissy Popadics," "basement fusion reactor," and "Dominic the Christmas Donkey." Why this happened I don't know. Perhaps Bobby Griffin of The Bestest Blog of All-Time can explain it. All I know is that the repitition of these these key phrases somehow pumped up the page ratings of the original (very different) posts in which each of these terms appeared. So, in fact, I did generate a little boomlet... most of which arrived via search arguments including "fusion" and "Thiago Olson" -- who really did build a fusion reactor of some sort in his parents' Detroit area home.

I thought this was all very amusing, until I noticed that one of the domain names was "pentagon.mil."

Uh oh, I thought. I've stepped in it now. Heistantly, cautiously, with some budding regret that I may have inadvertanly diverted someone from a national security matter, I clicked for details about this visit... what was the referring URL?

It was... page loading, tension building... Chrissy Popadics.

Ladies and gentlemen, Boise State's own Ian Johnson and Chrissy Popadics. It's still a great story....

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Long Suffering Spouse thinks she has it tough teaching junior high... or she did...

Until we saw this story on the 10:00 news last night....

This excerpt is from this morning's story in the Chicago Sun-Times by Annie Sweeney:
A 51-year-old Malcolm X College instructor who was demonstrating a math problem on her blackboard Tuesday was stabbed in the back by a student who apparently became frustrated with the exercise, authorities said.

The veteran instructor, who was teaching a GED class, was taken to Stroger Hospital, where she received stitches and was released, officials said.

The incident occurred around 11 a.m., when a 40-year-old female student in the class repeatedly asked the instructor to explain a math problem and apparently became upset when she couldn't grasp the material, Chicago Police said.

The student pulled a small steak knife and stabbed the teacher in the left shoulder area, said Monroe District Capt. John Kenny.

Kenny said that before the stabbing the student repeatedly said: "I don't understand. . . . Explain to me."
The explanation, apparently, was deemed insufficient by the student.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Speaking of orange and blue...

The Bears have their first playoff game on Sunday and many of us here in Chicago have passed right through worry and are close to panic.

Which Rex Grossman will show up? The one whose overall stats made a case for him to go to the Pro Bowl? Or the one who had a 1.3 QB rating against Arizona -- and, worse, a 0.0 rating against Green Bay on New Year's Eve?

Not everyone is panicking of course. Not Oldest Son. He's cruising eBay looking for tickets to the game. He'll pay as much as $150 or $200 from money he's not yet earned for the privilege.

I told him he doesn't need to spend that kind of money to get the whole stadium experience. For only $100, I told him, we'll open the windows so he can freeze. When he has to go to the bathroom I'll jump up and stand in front of him for 20 minutes. And just to show my generous side, I'll charge him only $4 for a can of beer instead of the $6 or more he'd pay at Soldier Field. (It is Soldier Field, by the way, not Soldier's. Or Soldiers'. Just another way we can tell who's really from here....)

So far Oldest Son has turned me down.

There will be all sorts of civic tributes to the Bears as we draw closer to Sunday's game. But I don't think any will equal the banner I saw this morning on Monroe Street at the Claretian Publications building.

I wish I had a camera; you'll have to settle for descriptive words. The banner -- orange and blue, of course -- was huge, as were the words "Go Bears."

But it was the next line that caught my eye:


The Claretian order operates the National Shrine of St. Jude, so the tie-in is natural.

But the banner that the good fathers have put up may not convey the right sense of, um, confidence?

St. Jude, you see, is the patron saint of desperate causes.

Go Bears!

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

The Orange and Blue team is no. 1 now right?

I mean, Ohio State lost to Florida last night. So that means the orange and blue team is the new National Champion, right?

You know... the one major college team that finished its season undefeated?

Boise State?

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

How not to win friends in the Circuit Clerk's office

I'd worked steadily on the brief all weekend. I didn't work constantly but, when I was on the computer, I was working more often than I was goofing off. And I was on the computer so much that Younger Daughter was beginning to despair that she'd ever get the opportunity to catch up on the latest developments in Teenage World via Facebook.

Younger Daughter recently broke up with a boy by changing her status on Facebook to single. He did the same. There is some question about the time-stamp on these two events, critical as always to the issue of whether one is the Dumper or the Dumpee. But I digress.

The brief was due yesterday. And, after working diligently all weekend, when Monday morning rolled around the brief was... not done.

Yes, I was agonizing over it. Looking for the 'right' word, for the 'best' citation.

It's a coverage case. A personal injury attorney has hired me to try and persuade the Chancery Court that the target defendant in his underlying case is covered under two excess insurance policies. While a lot of money is at stake, I will receive only an hourly fee for my services.

Still, being involved in big cases like this is the only way to become involved in other big cases in future... and in those cases maybe I'll be able to divert more of the income stream into my irrigation ditches.

So the brief wasn't done Monday morning. And it wasn't done at lunch time. But by 3:30 or so in the afternoon I had a draft ready to email to my referring attorney.

A few modest corrections here and there, a parenthesis closed, a comma removed, an extraneous article excised... all the corrected pages reprinted. It's coming up on 4:00.

I prepared the Notice of Filing and printed it, abbreviating the looooooong case caption to get the notice on a single page (two with the lengthy service list) and now I'm ready to photocopy. Now it's just past 4:00.

The photocopier is like the rest of us: It doesn't like to be neglected all day, only to be rushed into doing something at the last minute. It fought back the only way it could: With a paper jam. And then another.

Finally, though, the copier stopped balking and while the brief was running through the copier I put on my coat. I stapled the originals and headed out the back door. It was now 4:15.

The Clerk's office is in the Daley Center, just a couple of blocks away. But it closes at 4:30. And I had to wait for the elevator.

The elevators in our building were designed by a Zen Master to teach patience to an impatient world. The elevators are slow, yes, but not just slow: When the light on the button goes off there is a lengthy pause so that the elevator can stop and consider the wonder of becoming open.

Finally the light went off.

And the sound of moving machinery told me that the elevator was near.

But still I had to wait.

And wait.

And when the elevator believed that I had waited in silent contemplation for a sufficient period of time, the doors opened, and I went in.

This process was repeated on the ground floor.

It's after 4:20.

Yes, there are only two blocks to go, but there are streets to cross and the drivers have not learned patience, as I have. And I still must clear security.

By now it is 4:26... maybe 4:27... maybe even 4:28. Somewhere a timeclock must be reading 4:30 because all the public employees are beginning to swarm out of the courthouse.

I am as the salmon, swimming upstream. Only not to spawn and die -- just to file my papers. If I can get there before the doors close....

One of the double glass doors to Room 802 is already closed as I come out of the elevator. A man is just locking that side and turning his attention to the other and I hear someone shout, "Wait! There's another one!"

I don't know if he means me. I don't stop to find out. I execute a little bit of a spin move and make it around the man who's trying to close the door. I have made it in time.

Fortunately, yesterday, the pleading I had to file was something that did not require a fee. I could, and did, use the self-serve time-stamp box. If my papers had required a fee, I would have had to get in line... and face the Death Glare from the clerk.

If you ever want to see someone look at you just like this, just try and file a new Complaint in the Circuit Clerk's office -- any division will do -- at a minute before closing time on a Friday afternoon. Just don't expect me to go with you.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Monday, January 08, 2007

Internet Traffic... and my latest fiendish plan

Like Boris Badenov here, I have a new fiendish plan. However, my plan does not involve any threat of harm to "Moose or Squirrel."

Let me begin by saying I sometimes check my Sitemeter during the day.

And by "sometimes" I mean darn near constantly.

So I know how few many people are dropping by. And I know that there have been a few occasions where my posts have caused little traffic boomlets.

The little boomlets happen when people arrive via Google searches. And Sitemeter tells me what the search arguments were that led them to this humble establishment. Almost none of these who are steered here by Google searches stay long or leave comments, but it's quite late in the day today and I've had to interrupt my usual blogging routine with a dose of actual work. So I need something cheap and easy to get my daily numbers up to par.

So here goes: I'm thinking about a fictional post wherein Boise State cheerleader Chrissy Popadics creates a fusion reactor in her basement, all the while humming Dominic the Christmas Donkey.

That I've not actually written such a post shouldn't mean a thing... it's the search terms that count.

Good night everyone.

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Friday, January 05, 2007

A problem paying the bills... and not the one you're thinking of

Oh sure, I've complained about money problems here before. And I will again. But not today.

We receive a lot of mail at the Curmudgeon home. With two kids presently in college and another recently graduated, we receive credit card solicitations every single day for one or more of them. (You've been preapproved!)

Wouldn't you think that a kid smart enough to go to college would also be smart enough to see through the glamor of easy credit to the lifetime of debt servitude that lurks behind? The constant stream of credit card solicitations suggests otherwise.

Because we have kids in college, we also get loan solicitations from banks and other seemingly official-sounding institutions. (Important information about your child's college loan! But these aren't about existing loans at all; they're about how we should take out new ones.)

And Younger Daughter is a junior in high school. So she's receiving college information... a lot of it... every single day. Somewhere along the line, she failed to write her first name clearly on a form. So nearly all of these solicitations butcher her first name. The computers don't know that these random letters do not add up to anyone's actual name... although, in this day and age, maybe they do.

When I was a kid, I received an entire drawer full of college solicitations, mostly from schools in Illinois, Iowa or Wisconsin. Because I lived in Illinois. But Younger Daughter does also... and she's received solicitations from Washington State, Florida, Maine, and California and every point in between.

A week from tomorrow Youngest Son will take his entrance exam for the Catholic high school of his choice. He'll go where his brothers went... but the computers at all the other Catholic boys' and co-ed schools haven't yet given up hope. He's getting mail from all of them.

And then there's catalogs. Lots of catalogs. Baseball equipment. All the department stores. The occasional Victoria's Secret catalog.

I was mugging with a Victoria's Secret catalog one day, having (I thought) a little innocent fun with Long Suffering Spouse.

She put a quick stop to that: "You do realize that's addressed to your daughter?" she asked.

It was addressed to Older Daughter! I dropped the catalog immediately.

And then there's the junk mail related to our respective professions. Long Suffering Spouse is a teacher. There's a lot of continuing education solicitations and catalogs associated with that. And I receive all sorts of law related advertisements.


We subscribe to a number of magazines, too. I took over my parents' Smithsonian subscription when they passed; they used to give me their copies when they were through with them anyway. I'm starting to like that magazine better, most months, than National Geographic. But George Bailey and I joined the National Geographic Society at about the same age.

And then there's the Wilson Quarterly. There's something about everything in there. And the magazines I get from the Illinois State Historical Society. And American Heritage -- which used to be issued in hard cover, but now is just another magazine, albeit one that is usually a good read.

Did I mention Discover Magazine? We get that, too. My lips move when I read some of the articles, but I do try to be well informed on a variety of subjects.

And then there's Sports Illustrated. Youngest Son finally talked Long Suffering Spouse into getting him a subscription.

This will be interesting: Long Suffering Spouse would be none too pleased if I were to get the Swimsuit Edition... will Youngest Son get to keep his copy?

Every magazine sells your name to all sorts of other hopefuls, all of whom contribute to the junk mail pile. Which therefore grows and grows and... well, you get the drift.

And that's pretty much what the junk mail does in my house, accumulate in drifts. And somewhere in these drifts are the bills I'm supposed to pay.

And if I don't find 'em, I can't pay 'em -- and that's the problem I wanted to talk about with you this morning. Because it's happened to me recently.

But I'm afraid we're all out of time.

Hmmmmmm. I wonder if I can work from home on the day when the SI Swimsuit Edition comes out....
id= Stumble It!

Thursday, January 04, 2007

"Bloggies" nominations underway


Nominations are open until January 10 for the Seventh Annual Weblog Awards.

Barb at Skittles' Place has a post with further information, if you're interested.

I went over to take a look, but they don't seem to have a category for me -- unfocused, disjointed ramblings and feeble attempts at humor without any unifying theme.

Probably too long to fit on an award certificate anyway.
id= Stumble It!

Joke Thursday

With a tip of the cap or apologies as may be required to rdl who usually does "Joke Friday."

Mrs. Goldberg was very concerned about her son, Abie. Now in his late teens, Abie seemed to have no direction in life, no goals. Mrs. Goldberg confided to her friend, Mrs. Wise, that, to her, Abie seemed to be just drifting through life. Maybe she was missing something. Wasn't there anything she could do to find out if Abie really did have a purpose or a calling?

Mrs. Wise said there was. "We'll give him a test," she said. "Is there some place you can hide and still see the dining room table?" Mrs. Goldberg nodded. Mrs. Wise continued. "Good. So, one day, next week, when he comes home from school, hide so you can see the dining room table. On the dining room table you put three things:

"A $50 bill,





"a bottle of whiskey,









"and a Bible.







"Watch him and see what interests him," Mrs. Wise counseled. "If he takes the money, he's interested in business. You could do worse."

"True," agreed Mrs. Goldberg.

"If he takes the liquor," Mrs. Wise continued, "that's worse: It means he's only interested in carousing and carrying on."

"And if he takes the Bible?"

"It means he'll be a scholar after all. Maybe even a rabbi."

"A rabbi," echoed Mrs. Goldberg, and she agreed to try the plan.

The appointed day arrived, and Mrs. Goldberg carefully put the $50 bill at one end of the table, the bottle in the middle, and the Bible at the other end. She waited in a closet where she could watch. Eventually Abie came home.

He saw the items on the table right away. He walked around the table, looking at each. Back and forth he walked. Finally he stopped. He picked up the money and put it in his pocket. He picked up the bottle, opened it, took a generous swig, and put the bottle under his arm. The he walked over to the book, picked it up with his remaining hand and left the room.

Mrs. Goldberg was nearly hysterical with grief: "Oh no!" she cried, "He's going to become a Catholic priest!"
id= Stumble It!

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Younger Daughter wonders why I don't let her drive

Part of the problem, as I've mentioned in other contexts, is that I have an imagination.

And it's not bad enough that I have an imagination. People like Chris, from Thermal, post items on their blogs and I stop by... and follow the indicated link -- in all innocence -- and find pictures like this one.

But let's have some fun with this. How about a caption contest? Absolutely no prizes of any value will be awarded but your creativity will be on display for all your fellow denizens of the Blogosphere to see and enjoy. As always, keep it clean.

I'll start:

You said you wanted a side door. Now you've got your #$%@!! side door.

-- or --

(I'm hearing Wally Cox or Wallace Wimple from Fibber McGee & Molly as I'm writing this.) Sweetie? Um, Sweetums? I don't think this is a drive through.

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

Halfway point reached in ring season and all's quiet so far

The Christmas season is nearly over, whether we're on the nine ladies dancing or 10 Lords a'leaping. I haven't been keeping track.

But our own personal "ring season" is merely at the halfway mark.

Older Daughter was home for Christmas, arriving, in her new car, on the afternoon of Christmas Eve.

Her eventual arrival was heralded by the usual announcements:
  • The day before: I'm leaving at the crack of dawn tomorrow; I should be in by 8:30 or so in the morning;
  • 8:30 or so in the morning: I'm leaving now;
  • 10:30 or so in the morning: OK, now I'm leaving. Did you know the Post Office is closed today? Why would the Post Office be closed on Christmas Eve? (I don't know -- maybe because Christmas Eve was on a Sunday?)
There was a subsequent call asking about the price of gas in Chicago, but we believe that by that time she was in fact en route. Older Daughter does not let a little thing like a flashing gas tank dashboard icon hurry her into buying gasoline, not if three cents a gallon may be saved. The car would not run out of gas on her. This is how she thinks. Fortunately, gas is always pricier in Chicago than almost anywhere in Indiana.

The Boyfriend did not make the trip with her. He came up Tuesday, with his parents. The parents stayed downtown. The Boyfriend stayed in our basement.

Now, please don't get me wrong: I am not trying to marry off Older Daughter. However, she's been dating the Boyfriend now since early in their undergraduate days. After they both graduated, she moved to Indianapolis because that's where he lives. Some speculation along these lines is therefore inevitable.

There was, however, no movement reported along this front during the recent Boyfriend visit. But I don't think the crisis is behind us, particularly since Older Daughter has a February birthday. A Valentine's Day birthday, no less. Thus, I conclude, we're only halfway through our first "ring season."

My guess is that this is the first, and probably not the last, ring season for Older Daughter and the Boyfriend. But it's another milestone for me and my Long Suffering Spouse: This isn't something we've had to realistically worry about before.

Isn't it nice to unpack a fresh, new anxiety?

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

They've got to be to killing themselves at Fox

Trying to figure what to do for an encore, that is.

Last night's Fiesta Bowl on Fox was a stunner. A shocker. A made for TV movie: Cinderella Kicks Butt.

And after dominating the game over highly-favored No. 7 Oklahoma, the wheels seemed to come off the cart for Boise State, a "mid-major" from the unheralded Western Athletic Conference: Oklahoma came storming back late in the game with 18 unanswered points to tie. And that those 17th & 18th points did not come easily: Thanks to penalties, the Sooners got three chances to make the necessary two point conversion, but they finally, dramatically did so.

The Sooners didn't just have momentum back on their side. They had a tsunami. And then, in what seemed to be the last gasp, Boise QB Jared Zabransky gave up an interception. A pick six. The ball seemed over. Cinderella was shoeless -- and the coach had turned back into a pumpkin as orange as the Broncos' uniform pants.

And then Boise State, now looking to tie, scored on a crazy, 4th and 18 razzle-dazzle lateral play... and we went to overtime.

College overtime rules are so much better than the NFL: Each team gets a chance to score. If both score, a second OT is staged. If a third OT is necessary, a team scoring a touchdown must attempt a two-point conversion. Oklahoma had the ball first.

Adrian Peterson needed one play to get the Sooners their OT TD. One play. Men against boys. Goliath had shaken off David's pebble attack and gotten back on his feet.

And then it was Boise State's turn. They struggled. They did it piecemeal. But they finally scored... on fourth down again... on another 'go out to the manhole cover and turn toward the Buick' play.

And then they went for the two point conversion.

They're calling it a Statue of Liberty play. I think Oldest Son would dispute that, but Quarterback Zabransky mimed the throw with his right hand and Ian Johnson plucked the pigskin from Zabransky's left hand and ran to the corner of the endzone before several of the players knew he had the ball. I'm sure I wasn't the only viewer who needed the replay to figure out what I'd just seen.

Cinderalla 43, Established Football Powerhouse 42.

And the drama still wasn't over.

Ian Johnson gave a very composed post-game interview, with his adoring cheerleader girlfriend at his side and the usual chuckleheads crowding in the background making hand gestures of questionable decency. I was thinking what an unusually well-spoken young man he was... when he got down on one knee and proposed marriage to the aforementioned cheerleader girlfriend, Chrissy Popadics.

It took Ms. Popadics a couple of seconds to figure out what was happening... but she did... and she said yes.

The AP story today quotes Boise State QB Zabransky as saying he'd heard rumblings that Johnson was thinking about proposing.

"I'm sure it probably wouldn't have been as romantic if we would have lost," Zabransky said. You think?

So pity Fox Sports: How are they ever going to top this? And they've still got three more games to go....

Labels:

id= Stumble It!

Back to reality -- although I'm still blogging....

It's a new year, a new week, and I'm running late. The more things change, the more things stay the same....

But, thank you for asking, everyone made it through New Year's alright. Oldest Son continues in New Orleans awaiting the Sugar Bowl tomorrow night -- he spent New Year's Eve in the French Quarter. There were beads, he told us yesterday, and there was beer, and there was pizza.

Nothing quite says New Orleans to me like pizza.

No, that doesn't sound at all right.

Well, anyway, I am getting a very late start and I've got a major project due on Monday next. If my attendance is sporadic here these next few days, please forgive me. I have a lot of things I'd like to write about -- and your own sites and your comments here always suggest new ideas -- but the necessity of eating regularly and keeping a roof over my family sometimes intrudes. Rudely.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Meantime, speaking of comments, Barb at Skittles' Place has issued a challenge: She wants everyone to turn off word verification for a week and see what happens. What I think will happen is spam. And I already get several emails a day about contests I've won that I've never entered, about African widows who want me to handle their late husband's millions, and about things that are too small or medications that can be obtained by the bushel basket (also regarding things that are allegedly too small, come to think of it).

On the other hand, word verification is a pain: It's a continual reminder of how my vision is slipping... it really bugs me that every year TV's get better... and my eyesight gets worse. So, I'll accept Barb's challenge and give it a try... for a week, anyway....

Here goes....

Labels: ,

id= Stumble It!

FireFactor

  Subscribe in a reader

FREE Webmaster Tools

Submit your website
Free webmaster resources including SEO Tools, Computer Glossary and Webmaster Forum.

Who links to me?

Heads Or Tails