Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Heads or Tails #39 -- Piece or Peace

Today is Homophone Day at Heads or Tails and, no, we're not still talking about recent decisions of the California Supreme Court. "Homophones" are words that sound alike, though they are spelled differently and mean different things... as in today's pair of words at the Internet's premier Tuesday meme, piece or peace. Our magnificent mentor, Barb, gives us a lot of freedom with these topics... and therefore I'll write this morning about oil profits.

And, yes, Your Honor, I will tie this up with our topic.


The New York Times (genuflection optional) reported on April 30 that Royal Dutch Shell’s net income in just the first three months of 2008 ballooned to $9.08 billion and that British Petroleum reported a first quarter profit of $7.62 billion.

The Kansas City Star published Jane Wardell's AP story in its April 29 edition in which Wardell reported that Conoco-Phillips had a first quarter 2008 profit of $4.14 billion.

Read through David Lightman's story for the May 19 edition of the Kansas City Star and you'll find that Exxon-Mobil boasted a first quarter 2008 profit of $10.9 billion.

That's just four oil companies -- there are others -- who together report $31.74 billion in profits in just three months. That's profit -- you know, after you've footed the bill for sponsoring Masterpiece Theatre. (No, wait, ExxonMobile dropped its sponsorship in 2004.)

There are roughly 6.67 billion people on this planet. To put that $31.74 billion into some perspective, that amounts to roughly $4.76 for each and every man, woman and child... everywhere.

Lightman's KC Star article is not just about oil profits; it explains why serious economists think a windfall profits tax on these gushing oil profits would not be a good idea. The article quotes skeptical St. Louis University economics professor Muhammad Islam: "How do you define the word windfall? How do you define `normal price?'"

Writing about obscenity, in a concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964), Justice Potter Stewart said, "I know it when I see it."

Well, I know a windfall profit when I see it, too. And I'm seeing it here. And it's also obscene.

And now to tie it all up: One percent of $31.74 billion is still $317,400,000. One tenth of one percent of $31.74 billion is $31,740,000.

Keep on cutting: One one-hundredth of one percent of those first quarter profits would be $3,174,000. If I could just get me that little piece of that pie -- a crumb from the table, really -- and I'd be set for life.

When the crumbs the oil companies flick off their metaphorical bibs without a backward glance are so large they could turn anyone who catches just one into a millionaire... I put it to you that their profits are too large. I'm the last person in the world who would advocate confiscatory taxation under usual circumstances. As an American, I celebrate the success of my neighbors (OK, I get jealous, too) -- but I want to get my own -- I don't want to take away theirs. But there's another old saying to which I subscribe: Pigs get fat, but hogs get slaughtered. The oil companies have become hogs.

Monday, May 19, 2008

California court decision prompts modest proposal

Some years back, when the "gay marriage" movement was just gaining steam, I made a proposal that was immediately ridiculed by friends on both the Right and the Left.

One colleague, in particular, a Democrat in DuPage County (and therefore a True Believer... as she was often so alone out there... although even DuPage has gotten 'purpler' since) called my suggestion "cowardly."

Last week's decision by the California Supreme Court, however, spurs me to renew that suggestion now: I propose we get the State out of the marriage business altogether.

Many churches -- most, I dare say -- would not recognize homosexual marriages. But some would. Churches have monopolized the marriage business in this country for years, if not forever. Sure, one could always go to City Hall to tie the knot -- but that was never necessary. Only a license was required -- a registration that a particular type of partnership, a marriage, was about to be entered into.

And, in the law, we have treated marriage as a partnership contract. It has been a particular kind of contract in the past, a contract that could only be entered between a man and a woman, a partnership that may produce offspring instead of widgets. And the law in many states -- even those that don't recognize gay marriages -- has evolved to acknowledge "domestic partnerships" that are similar to marriages in all respects except the name.

I say the State's real interest in marriage is in registering the partnership -- the licensing part. Determining that this partnership is a marriage and that one is not strikes me as legally unnecessary. Public registration is really necessary so that, in the event of a dissolution of the partnership, one partner can not be unfairly disadvantaged and become a burden on society.

Now, after thousands of years, in the span of a couple of decades, a clearly understood societal standard has moved. Or has been moved by activist judges. Or has been moved by crusaders for social justice. I don't care who moved what! The line has moved.

And it may move again.

After all, the Old Testament recognized plural marriage. If marriage is no longer to be exclusively a union between one man and one woman, why can't a Mormon have as many wives as he can afford? Gay marriage may have no Biblical roots -- but polygamy does. Moreover, the Qur'an certainly permits a Muslim man to have more than one wife. Must we expect, then, that "marriage" must be redefined to include polygamy too?

And, if we will permit polygamy, must we not also permit polyandry? Why shouldn't a woman have multiple husbands... if she wants? (Maybe one of them will leave the toilet seat down.)

In fact, as long as we're at it, why shouldn't Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice be permitted to enter into a group marriage if they so choose?

No, I'm not trying to ridicule my own proposal: If who may form a "marriage" is now a civil rights issue, a matter for individuals to decide according to their own consciences, and for courts to enforce regardless of what "majorities" say, why shouldn't we expect individuals to come up with all sorts of ideas about what a "marriage" should be?

It was, at one time, easy to tell what was and was not a marriage. Now... well, contract law and partnership law are very flexible. Divorce law and the law involving the dissolution of business partnerships share many similarities. We can let the law decide how to relate to these new domestic arrangements without trying to make the state responsible for defining what marriage is.

I expect that, in time, there will be a new line.

I just don't know where it will be drawn. In the meantime, with gasoline at over $4 a gallon, good jobs leaving the country in droves every single day, and our schools producing illiterates, does it really make sense to waste so much public time and energy debating whether Ellen DeGeneres can get "married" to her companion?

I'm not asking anyone to change their views about what marriage is. My own opinions in this regard remain entirely unchanged by the 172 pages of California jurisprudence linked at the outset of this essay. I just want to get the State out of this suddenly-contentious business.

Friday, May 16, 2008

The last of our proms is tonight...

...and it's about time.

The 'little black dress' has been used for each of the three preceding proms -- if there are three different escorts it's apparently acceptable to use the same dress with each.

The one dress Long Suffering Spouse and I liked best will not be worn at all. Presumably because we liked it. But Younger Daughter would never admit that.

No, tonight is the night for Younger Daughter's Prom -- all of the others have been for other schools -- and therefore tonight will be the night she unveils the new dress.

It's orange.

I said it's hard to find a turtleneck that goes with orange -- but I was ignored, as per usual.

I had a brief flare of hope last night as we discussed plans for this evening. It seems that Younger Daughter's escort has gotten in some trouble at his school and will be required to serve the dreaded Saturday detention -- meaning he must be at school at 8:00 a.m. -- and meaning, further, I found out last night, that the boy's parents will require him to return by 1:30 a.m.

Yes! I exulted.

But... my hopes were quickly and cruelly dashed. Youngest Son advised that he has a baseball tournament on Saturday morning. He's not sure where it is... but he must be at school to catch the bus by 6:30 a.m.

And then Younger Daughter said it was a shame that her escort was obligated to return home but she didn't see why she couldn't continue on and frolic with her friends until 3:00 a.m.

And then, worst of all, Long Suffering Spouse indicated a willingness to go along with Younger Daughter's plan. She confirmed it this morning.

Unlike the days of my carefree youth, when I came home singing with the birds just before dawn, I now generally fall asleep by 9:00 p.m. on Fridays.... the weeks are just too long for me now. But this one is going to be a lot longer than usual.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

More unsolicited advice, this time for Sen. McCain

In this morning's post, I suggested a retired Marine Corps general as a helpful running mate for Senator Obama. Senator McCain doesn't need any help establishing his military credentials. His service record is more than sufficient. From Wikipedia (footnotes omitted):
John McCain's capture and imprisonment began on October 26, 1967. He was flying his twenty-third bombing mission over North Vietnam, when his A-4E Skyhawk was shot down by a missile over Hanoi. McCain fractured both arms and a leg, and then nearly drowned when he parachuted into Truc Bach Lake in Hanoi. After he regained consciousness, a mob attacked him, crushed his shoulder with a rifle butt, and bayoneted him; he was then transported to Hanoi's main Hoa Loa Prison, nicknamed the "Hanoi Hilton".

Although McCain was badly wounded, his captors refused to treat his injuries, instead beating and interrogating him to get information. Only when the North Vietnamese discovered that his father was a top admiral did they give him medical care and announce his capture. His status as a prisoner of war (POW) made the front pages of New York Times and Washington Post.

McCain spent six weeks in the Hoa Loa hospital, receiving marginal care. Now having lost 50 pounds (23 kg), in a chest cast, and with his hair turned white, McCain was sent to a different camp on the outskirts of Hanoi in December 1967, into a cell with two other Americans who did not expect him to live a week. In March 1968, McCain was put into solitary confinement, where he would remain for two years.

In July 1968, McCain's father was named commander of all U.S. forces in the Vietnam theater. McCain was immediately offered early release. The North Vietnamese wanted a worldwide propaganda coup by appearing merciful, and also wanted to show other POWs that elites like McCain were willing to be treated preferentially. McCain turned down the offer of repatriation; he would only accept the offer if every man taken in before him was released as well.

In August of 1968, a program of severe torture began on McCain, at the same time as he was suffering from dysentery, and McCain made an anti-American propaganda "confession". He has always felt that his statement was dishonorable, but as he would later write, "I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine." His injuries left him permanently incapable of raising his arms above his head. He subsequently received two to three beatings per week because of his continued refusal to sign additional statements. Other American POWs were similarly tortured and maltreated in order to extract "confessions" and propaganda statements, with many enduring even worse treatment than McCain.

McCain refused to meet with various anti-war groups seeking peace in Hanoi, not wanting to give either them or the North Vietnamese a propaganda victory. From late 1969 on, treatment of McCain and some of the other POWs became more tolerable. McCain and other prisoners cheered the B-52-led U.S. "Christmas Bombing" campaign of December 1972 as a forceful measure to push North Vietnam to terms.

Altogether, McCain was held as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for five and a half years. He was finally released from captivity on March 14, 1973.
I don't usually clip such long sections, but it seemed appropriate here. Even in an encyclopedia entry, it's a compelling narrative.

If elected, McCain would not be a "military hero" in the Grant or Eisenhower mold -- he planned and executed no grand strategies, he won no battles. But even the most partisan Democrats won't question his heroism.

The problem for Senator McCain is that he comes off as the grumpy old man who is forever shooing kids off his lawn. For balance, he'd need someone younger, hipper, "cooler" -- obviously flexible, someone whose presence on the ticket would highlight McCain's argument that he's not as doctrinaire as he will be portrayed by his opponents.

In short, McCain's ideal running mate would be... Barack Obama. Or at least a more conservative facsimile thereof.

Unfortunately, Mr. Obama will probably be otherwise engaged in November... although Hillary still has her own hopes.....

Republicans don't have a long line of younger, cooler, genial types. Many in the Talk Radio Right would impose former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee on Senator McCain.

If McCain accepts Huckabee it is because he has subscribed to the rule of "keep your friends close and your enemies closer."

American presidential primaries are about appealing to party activists -- thus Democrats must run Left and Republicans must run Right. The survivors of this process have to then reverse field and run back toward the Center... where most Americans really are.

That will be hard for both candidates this year. Arguably, Senator Obama started left and has stayed there -- if Senator McCain can be said to have started closer to the center... it must also be said that he ran hard right, picking up baggage like the endorsement of the Rev. John Hagee along the way. (Wikipedia says the Rev. Hagee has apologized for some of his more virulent anti-Catholic remarks. But is this apology grounded in expedience or repentance?)

Sadly, though both candidates seem to be honorable and worthwhile as individuals, deciding for whom to vote may come down to deciding whose allies, confederates and hangers-on are less scary.

And that does bring us back to McCain's selection of a Vice President. Although the Republicans have held national office for nearly eight years now, the crop of likely veeps is very thin. Anyone too closely associated with the present administration is radioactive. And Republicans have a hard time playing young and hip and cool. I believe the last time they tried this for purposes of a national ticket, this is what they got:

Dan Quayle.


Maybe the best advice would be to counter former University of Chicago Law Professor Barack Obama with a former University of Chicago Law Professor of their own. (Yes, yes, I know, Obama was never full-time on a tenure track -- but, although academics may think it's a crime, most people think that "Professor" is an appropriate title for any instructor at an institution of higher learning.)

But Justice Scalia is already 72 -- and, besides, why would he want to give up his present gig?

McCain's ultimate selection may be the biggest surprise of the year -- and, given the long odds facing Republicans this year, an honor many would want to avoid. Who would you recommend for Senator McCain?

Unsolicited advice to the (presumptive) nominee

Oliphant cartoon obtained from Yahoo! Comics.

At some point, maybe even before the convention in Denver, Mrs. Clinton is expected to step aside gracefully and acquiesce in the outcome of the nominating procedures of her party. I'm not entirely certain that this will happen -- if someone told me her middle name was "Rambo" I might be willing to believe it -- but this is the conventional (*ahem*) wisdom at this point.

If she does step aside, a faction of the Democratic Party will boost her candidacy for Vice President. In the accompanying cartoon, Mr. Oliphant seems less than enthused about this prospect.

Senator Obama should also feel less than enthused. If he does select her it would be only because he believes the old saying, "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer." She would not be a loyal helpmate; in her mind, at least, she's been there, done that.

Besides, the Republicans would have a field day, using clips of Clinton's attacks on Obama and Obama's attacks on Clinton in their advertising. Even in what should be a big Democratic year... it just might work.

No, what Senator Obama needs is someone for balance. He's perceived as inspirational, even "cool" -- but Senator Clinton's relentless attacks have scored points with the electorate: Many potential supporters wonder if there is substance beneath the style. Thus, Obama needs someone with gravitas. Any Democratic nominee will be portrayed as suspect on national security; Obama -- who's never served in the military and who has indeed associated with bomb-throwing refugees from the '60s (hey, who do you think lives in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood?) -- will have a particularly heavy burden of persuasion on this point come November.

The ideal choice for Obama, therefore, might be a career military man who is on record as having opposed the Iraq war. A lot of senior military men saluted and said 'yes, sir' when given the mission to topple Saddam Hussein -- but blanched and sputtered and protested when told about the size of the force with which they were to hold the country. Some, however, thought the enterprise flawed from the beginning.

General Anthony C. Zinni, USMC retired, is apparently one of the ones who had reservations right from the start. Although born in Pennsylvania, he's teaching now at Duke. His memoir, Battle Ready, was written with Tom Clancy and, according to the linked Wikipedia entry "features stinging criticism of the planning for the 2003 invasion of Iraq and more specifically, the post-battle planning." (I'll be on the lookout for this book.)

General Zinni would be hard to marginalize, unlike fellow ex-Marine John Murtha -- who has a long voting record in Congress that could be exploited. Mr. Murtha also carries with him the lingering taint of the Abscam investigation (though he was never charged, he did testify against two other Congressmen accused of pocketing bribes). Besides, he recently charged that Senator McCain is "too old" to be President... and Murtha is older. In fact, Murtha said he was speaking from experience in making the charge.

(The linked Wikipedia entry says that Murtha enlisted in the Marines and rose to the rank of drill instructor before being selected for Officer Candidate School. After retiring from active duty in the Marine Corps, Murtha remained in the reserves, volunteering for service in Vietnam in 1966-67 "receiving the Bronze Star with Valor device, two Purple Hearts and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry." Murtha ultimately retired from the reserves as a colonel. This is not why he's been vilified by the Talk Radio Right; I understand that the Right excoriates his political views and associations, not his service. But I did not know these details before looking them up today; perhaps you did not either.)

There are other anti-Iraq war generals around, some of whom have already endorsed Senator Obama, and there's always General Wesley Clark, although he, of course, was an early Clinton supporter.

The problem with choosing a Vice President for "balance" is that -- like choosing a nominee for the Supreme Court -- it doesn't always work out as planned. A lot of people, wary of George W. Bush's youthful excesses, were relieved when he selected Dick Cheney as his running mate. To many, it seemed like the grownups would be taking charge again... but the polls certainly indicate that many no longer hold this view.

Next up: Unsolicited advice to Senator McCain. Believe it or not, that's tougher.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Oldest Son comes home for Mother's Day

Oldest Son is living on his own these days. He has a nice job. He drives a company car.

We expected Oldest Son home for Mother's Day if for no other reason than his mother baked him a cake. You see, Oldest Son's birthday was also last week.

So we weren't surprised when the nice company car pulled up out front. But there was just a teensy bit of surprise when he opened up the trunk and took out something enormous -- so big, really, he was struggling to carry it.

Awwwwww, you're thinking, the gainfully employed son brings his mother a giant gift for Mother's Day.

And wouldn't that be nice?

Of course, it wasn't a gift.

He was struggling to carry in a huge bag of laundry.

But he did it himself.

Vatican says it's OK to believe in aliens

E.T., be sure to mention this when you next phone home:

The Tribune reported Tuesday that Fr. Jose Gabriel Funes, S.J., the Director of the Vatican Observatory, says that aliens would still be God's creatures. To rule out the existence of aliens because, for example, they're not mentioned in the Bible, "would be like 'putting limits' on God's creative freedom."

The Jesuit astronomer has it exactly right, I think. I believe the creationists may fail to give God enough credit. Evolution -- to cite another controversial example -- doesn't disprove the existence of God, nor is acceptance of evolution a rejection of religion. Why can't we accept (as most Christians have been taught) that God 'works in mysterious ways His wonders to perform'?

If God always intervened directly and understandably in the affairs of this world, the recent cyclone in Myanmar would have drowned only the leaders of the ruling junta. Katrina never would have struck New Orleans while a stone was standing on a stone in any of Kim Jong-il's palaces in North Korea. Good people would live to ripe old ages with grateful children and grandchildren; bad people would be the ones to suffer from disease.

But God doesn't make it that easy for us. For any of us.

Today's Sun-Times carries an AP report that a letter of Albert Einstein's is to be auctioned off this week. According to the article, this letter, written late in Einstein's life, dismisses "the idea of God as the product of human weakness" and calls the Bible "childish."

But -- also late in his life -- Einstein wrote that "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

The first passage may have been written at a time when Einstein had momentarily succumbed to the doubt and despair that claims us all from time to time about the Infinite -- but, in the second quote, Einstein gets it exactly right.

I believe the religious right has been at least as harsh and critical of space exploration as the tree-hugging left... for different reasons of course. I submit that both are wrong. God gave us free will and an urge to explore (yes, even if He gave it to us through natural selection) and we spurn His gifts when we fail to use them. We bury our talents... and you Bible readers will remember what happened to that guy.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Heads or Tails #38 -- Any Tom, Dick or Harry

Today is the day of everyman at Heads or Tails, America's fastest growing Tuesday meme: In this exciting episode Barb wants us to write about any Tom, Dick or Harry.

The phrase any "Tom, Dick or Harry" is used, in English, to mean anyone.

So when the box arrives on Christmas eve and the box says that it's so easy to build the toy inside (from the 4,598 component parts) that any Tom, Dick or Harry can do it -- that's when you tell your wife your name is Ed and she can darn well get one of them to do it; you're going to the kitchen for another egg nog.

I remember Bill Veeck telling the story about how he had to build a rocking horse one Christmas Eve while the children were dreaming all snug in their beds, etc.

Well, a couple of festive beverages were consumed and parts were jammed here and there as seemed expedient at the moment... and when the job was done, the head was where the tail should have been and vice versa. Veeck's wife was less than impressed... but he told her it was alright, they'd just name the horse Charlie Finley.

Though "Tom, Dick and Harry" can describe everyman, can you name the only three American presidents who had those names? (There's only one of each.)

Now, ask your children... or grandchildren. Will they know?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, to rouse you from the gloomy mood in which you will surely find yourself when you pop the foregoing quiz on your descendants, may I provide these lyrics from the musical, Kiss Me Kate. Ann Miller, on the left, is Bianca. Play this in the YouTube of your mind -- the name of the song, of course, from which these excerpts are taken is "Tom, Dick or Harry":

BIANCA:
I'm a maid who would marry
And will take with no qualm
Any Tom, Dick or Harry,
Any Harry, Dick or Tom,
I'm a maid mad to marry
And will take double-quick
Any Tom, Dick or Harry,
Any Tom, Harry or Dick.

GREMIO:
I'm the man thou shouldst marry.

BIANCA:
Howdy, Pop!

GREMIO:
Howdy, Mom.

LUCENTIO:
I'm the man thou shouldst marry.

BIANCA:
Art thou Harry, Dick or Tom?

HORTENSIO:
I'm the man thou shouldst marry.

BIANCA:
Howdy, pal!

HORTENSIO:
Howdy, chick!

BIANCA:
Art thou Tom, Dick or Harry?

HORTENSIO:
Call me Tom, Harry or Dick.


(Lyrics obtained from allmusicals.com. Photo of Ann Miller and Kathryn Grayson obtained and edited from original at Movie Market (UK).)

A whole new meaning to "blogging buzz"?

(Obtained from Yahoo! Comics, but I read it Monday morning in the Chicago Sun-Times. Click to enlarge)

It would be interesting to see how many bloggers clip and post this episode of Pearls Before Swine.

Monday, May 12, 2008

The attractiveness of Tony Rezko

As this is written, closing arguments are underway in the corruption trial of Antonin "Tony" Rezko in the Federal Court here in Chicago.

As a life-long, cynical Chicagoan I suspect that Mr. Rezko may be guilty of all sorts of crimes. As a lawyer, though, I don't know whether any of the actual pending charges against him may be proved. That is for the jury to decide, based on the evidence presented in court. I only know what I've read in the papers -- and that's not evidence.

But this is not an exercise in handicapping Mr. Rezko's fate. There seems to be a belief among the pundit class that the Government's star witness against him, Stuart Levine, came off so badly in court that Rezko may walk. But I claim no special insight into whether he will or he won't.

I do think, though, I have a clue into why he was so attractive to political candidates in Chicago... like embattled Governor Rod Blagojevich, whose name has been freely bandied about during Rezko's trial, and Senator Barack Obama, whose name has also come up, though not nearly as often.

It costs money to run for office. Rezko could raise money. Lots of money. He was willing to back less well known candidates (Obama, for example).

When I ran for judge, well over a decade ago now, raising money was the single most distasteful thing I had to do. I recall hearing a judge speak recently about getting elected, and he said how wonderful it was that people came out of nowhere to support him. It was a welcome surprise, he said, how people he barely knew became his biggest source of strength.

Nobody came out of anywhere when I ran for judge. But I can't help but wonder... if someone like Mr. Rezko had materialized when I was a candidate... would he and his contributions have been so welcome that I might not inquire... at least not right away... into why he was so generous?

Of course, most of you reading this would probably say that you'd see right through him, that nobody offers something for nothing, and you'd slap him and his fistful of dollars away. But most of you reading this have never run for office and have never faced the prospect of raiding your own hard-earned savings or stressing hard-earned friendships by asking for donations.

I have no sympathy for corruption. And I'd like to think I'd see through a Tony Rezko, too, and keep him at arm's length. But it's got to be an awful temptation for someone with enough self-confidence to seek elective office to think that the donor could be controlled or 'handled', to think that his insistence that he was only interested in 'good government' was really sincere, to see only the public plaudits heaped on the donor and ignore any whisperings about what might lay behind the smiling face... until the subpoenas begin to fly and your own career has been destroyed....

I have no sympathy for corruption. But evil doesn't always advertise. Sometimes temptation comes with a smile of seeming friendship and generosity. Sometimes when things are too good to be true... they are to good to be true.

Another reason to dislike bottled water

I was at the periodontist last week.

Yes, though I am getting long in the tooth figuratively, I am still trying to avoid that condition in the literal sense.

I had submitted to my cleaning and had received a reasonably good report about my dental condition when the hygienist asked if I would like a fluoride treatment. I expressed surprise: Isn't the water treated with fluoride? That's when the hygienist expressed surprise. "You don't drink bottled water?" she asked.

Apparently many people do.

Why people would drink water in plastic bottles -- contributing unnecessarily to landfills and the price of oil -- is something that has long baffled me. There might be good reasons to drink bottled water in areas where the local water supply is suspect -- but that's certainly not yet the case in American cities.

The periodontist came in at this point, looking to poke and prod my gums and make his own pitch for fluoride treatment. It seems that people who are drinking bottled water aren't getting fluoride that is supposed to prevent tooth decay... and people who have consumed bottled water exclusively over a long period of time are experiencing dramatically increased rates of tooth decay.

So now people who pay extra for water must pay extra also for fluoride treatments. Who knew?

Quoting myself... or maybe not


Money: You can't take it with you -- but you can't stay here without it!

--------------------------------------------------------------

This little bon mot was in my head this weekend... and I thought I'd use it today in a post. But first I wanted to see if it was something I'd made up or overheard. (Always want to provide proper attribution, doncha know?)

A Yahoo! search told me it had been used before... by me... but also by one Doug Sparks, an author with whom I am not familiar.

There really is nothing new under the Sun, is there?

Friday, May 09, 2008

The law of unintended consequences -- Part 9,152

It is widely supposed, in certain circles at least, that Indiana's law to require voters to present identification at the polling place was a sneaky reactionary plot to disenfranchise poor, elderly, disabled and minority voters.

In a word, Democrats.

And these suspicions were confirmed, in those same certain circles at least, when that nasty old Supreme Court upheld the law on April 28, with the plurality opinion written by that extreme right-winger, John Paul Stevens.

No, wait. That doesn't work, does it?

I went outside to cut the grass on Sunday morning and I wasn't carrying my wallet. I felt... less than dressed. In this day and age, who ever goes out in public without some form of identification?

We got our answer Tuesday, during the Indiana primary. The AP reported that 12 nuns from St. Mary's Convent in South Bend, all of them in their 80s and 90s, were turned away when they tried to vote by a fellow nun, Sr. Julie McGuire. Sr. Julie was apparently serving as election judge -- at least the AP story says she's the one who turned her older sisters away -- because none of them had any current identification.

Ladies and gentlemen, I put it to you thusly: If the Indiana statute was meant to erect obstacles to the exercise of the franchise by likely Democratic voters, it failed spectacularly.

These nuns weren't going to vote for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton; they weren't going to take Democratic ballots at all.

I can't know this with absolute certainty, of course, because I was not there. But I can so state with an extremely high degree of confidence based on my own experience.

There I was, in the parking lot of our parish school, a polling place for multiple precincts, on Primary Day in Illinois in (I think) 1996. It might have been 1994.

I was running for judge -- and I had been designated by my volunteer coordinator to work my own precinct, handing out my card.

(Of course, my volunteer coordinator was Long Suffering Spouse. She was also the only other volunteer. She had another multi-precinct polling place she was covering elsewhere in the ward.)

About mid-morning, a whole troop of nuns descended en masse on the parking lot, walking over from the hospital convent a little down the road.

These were my people, I thought. Wasn't I active in the parish? Weren't all my children enrolled here at the parish school? (And most of the nuns who could have contradicted this illusion of character that I'd so carefully constructed over the years were surely dead by then... or at least far away on the South Side. So I was pretty confident.)

Some of the good sisters were charitable enough to say that they'd heard my name when I presented my credentials. And they all expressed hopes for my success. And I'm sure they were telling the truth. Nuns wouldn't lie, would they?

But I didn't get a single vote from any of them. Because I was running as a Democrat (as one must if one hopes to be elected to the bench almost anywhere in Cook County).

The nuns had come in a group to support the candidacy of some Republican running for statewide office who'd come out strongly against abortion. Sisters, I tried to tell them, this man couldn't do a thing about abortion unless you could elect him to the Supreme Court of the United States -- and it doesn't work that way.

But the nuns would not be dissuaded.

And that's how I know for sure that those nuns in South Bend, even though they fit the description of elderly and poor, weren't trying to vote Democratic. If you believe the conspiracy theory behind the Indiana law, the nuns and, more to the point, the Republican candidates they'd come out to support, were victims of the law of unintended consequences.

More about our plethora of proms

Today's word of the day is "plethora." For more information, see ¡Three Amigos!

I don't understand: I thought I'd stumbled on something new and amazing -- backup boyfriends and backup girlfriends -- each of them apparently aware of their secondary status. I don't know if the primaries are aware of their backups... but if this phenomenon is widespread, might the existence of backups not be expected, or at least suspected, by every primary?

But, no, my anthropological discovery seems to have left my commenters cold. What has interested you is... dresses.

For the record, Younger Daughter has only bought one new dress for this prom season. It's rather orange.

She's worn a black dress to the first two proms -- yes, the same dress -- and she bought it for a dance a year or two ago. Of course, she did have two different dates for these.

I don't know what dress is scheduled for this Saturday -- yes, she's going to the co-ed school prom, too -- but it won't be the orange one.

That's for her own school prom, the last in this long, long sequence.

Now I suppose you'll ask me to describe the dresses.

Please.

Long Suffering Spouse is the final arbiter in the matter of prom fashions, determining whether a dress may be worn or must be returned. As a practicing coward, I try and stay as far away as possible from these discussions. Even after grudging approval, though, I have asked Younger Daughter what color turtleneck she will wear with each dress.

But no one ever takes me seriously.

Thursday, May 08, 2008

The Barbara Walters affair

Reading the paper in the past week or so I learned that, years ago, during their Star Wars days, Carrier Fisher acted on her crush on Harrison Ford. And that, also many years ago, Cher thought a young Tom Cruise so cute, she decided to take him home with her. If you know what I mean.

(The article I read did not mention whether the young Tom Cruise jumped on Cher's couch.)

I can't get too exercised about these revelations: Actors are traditionally public about their private lives... and they seem to live a lot.

But I find Barbara "If you were a tree what kind of tree would you be" Walters' recent revelation of her 1970's affair with a married U.S. Senator to be another matter entirely.

Once we get out of Hollywood, I thought the traditional rule applies: If a man kisses and tells, he is a cad.

What word should we use for Ms. Walters?

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Two proms down... two more to go?

Prom season is in full bloom at the Curmudgeon home this year. Some years are worse for allergies, too.

Younger Daughter has a prom at her all-girls school -- and she managed to snag invitations to proms at the two local all-boys schools as well. I've written about her plotting and planning over proms -- and about my own discomfort with the whole ritual -- here and here.

Now comes word that Younger Daughter has also been asked to the prom at the local co-ed Catholic high school. She claims to be torn about accepting, although Long Suffering Spouse thinks this hand-wringing is strictly play-acting for our benefit. The dilemma, as Younger Daughter claims to frame it is that, on the one hand, she has a number of girlfriends at that school that will not be at her own prom the following weekend -- but, on the other hand, she has to read at 7:00 a.m. Mass on the morning after... and she'd be going as the date of one her friend's back-up boyfriends.

You read that right: Back-up boyfriends. Apparently in today's world, kids don't need to wait until after a breakup for the next infatuation to develop because they already have someone warmed and ready in the bullpen to come in at a moment's notice.

Youngest Son recently attended a dance at his school as the escort for one of his friend's backup girlfriends. So this is a phenomenon that cuts across gender lines.

Yes, it was a lovely evening. After the dance, some in the group wanted to continue on to a restaurant. Others wanted to repair to someone's house for awhile before heading home. Youngest Son was in this latter camp. But Youngest Son's friend, the one with the backup girlfriend, wanted to go to the restaurant... so off the friend went with both girls, his own date and the backup previously escorted by Youngest Son. Apparently thinking it was the chivalrous thing to do, Youngest Son gave his about-to-be-ex-date money for pizza.

And, no, I don't understand any of this either.

So Younger Daughter has a chance to attend four proms, a record that would eclipse the family record (three) set by Middle Son in 2005. (For the record -- yours truly went to no proms and neither did Long Suffering Spouse. We claim to have survived this high school humiliation without injury -- but our children firmly believe otherwise.)

Younger Daughter worries, now, that, if she accepts the pending offer to provide an escort for her friend's backup boyfriend, she'll be "prommed out" by the time of her own prom the following week.

I know I'll be.

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Heads or Tails #37 -- Mother

Today's Heads or Tails is seasonal. Just in time for Mother's Day, Barb wants us to remember "mother."

*Sigh.*


Both my parents are gone now -- we're just past the 8th anniversary of my mother's passing. I've not written much about my parents here. I did mention that my mother was such a shopper, she was still getting credit cards years after she died. I haven't seen one lately; that probably means she's about due for another one.

Shopping was what my mother liked to do. If someone stuck a "One Day Sale" sign in a pile of rags by the side of the road, she'd pull over to check it out. It was, we figured, a Depression-era thing: She had nothing then; she could indulge herself now. So why not?

No one talked much about those days... my mother's father died young and my mother's family had to depend on the charity of more prosperous relatives to stay afloat. The relatives' charity was apparently uneven: They could spring for a Catholic boarding school in Iowa where my mother and her sisters attended high school, but my mother did mention that she was often in doubt about where she might get her next pair of shoes.

After their deaths, while cleaning out my parents' house, my sister and I found how my mother had compensated for her childhood shoe deprivation. I always knew she had a lot shoes; I did not know she was a shoe hoarder on the order of Imelda Marcos. There were boxes and boxes of boots, heels, pumps -- many of them never, ever worn, not even once. The tags were still on.

My mother wasn't just a shopper. She was a pioneer of sorts. She was one of the first women to obtain an undergraduate degree at her formerly all-male college.

But she loved to shop. During her final illness she wanted to 'make a memory' for Younger Daughter. She saved up her strength for a final trip downtown, with Younger Daughter in tow, to visit the American Girl doll store. Then they had lunch at an elegant hotel on North Michigan Avenue. My mother's plan worked: Younger Daughter still talks of that day. It is a cherished memory.

But, then, Younger Daughter likes to shop, too.

Long Suffering Spouse does not. If there was any area of friction in the otherwise wonderful relationship between my wife and my mother, it was over shopping.

One time, at least 22 years ago, my mother tried to take Long Suffering Spouse on a big shopping expedition. Long Suffering Spouse was willing to indulge her. We had only two children at the time, Older Daughter and Oldest Son, and Oldest Son was still a bottle-feeding infant. I assume both of them came along, but only Oldest Son figures in the story. They all went to Marshall Field's downtown store -- which was then a shopper's paradise. (It is now just another Macy's. Macy's may be a fine chain of stores. It inspired a wonderful Christmas movie. But renaming Marshall Field's flagship State Street store has proved a disaster for the Macy's chain -- unless their idea is to sell the property to real estate developers when the condo market turns around again.)

My mother wanted to take her daughter-in-law and grandchildren to Field's because it was such a "grandma thing" to do. My father used to tease her that she'd forgotten everything she ever knew about raising children when she became a grandmother, but I don't think that was the problem. I think she thought children automatically behaved differently for grandparents.

And maybe older children can be persuaded (or wheedled, cajoled, or threatened) into behaving in a more subdued manner when in the grandparents' presence... but not infants. And this was to be the day that Oldest Son taught my poor mother that lesson.

Oldest Son never ate much; we were convinced for a long time that he derived nourishment directly from air molecules.

But when he wanted his bottle, he wanted it. Right then. And there would be a couple of times a day where he would become most insistent about it. It didn't matter where we were; it didn't matter what we were doing. For a kid who didn't eat much, being hungry was a need that had to be attended to immediately.

Somewhere along the line, while my mother was happily browsing through piles of merchandise marked for clearance, Oldest Son first began to note that he was hungry. My mother planned to take Long Suffering Spouse and the kids to the 7th floor dining room for lunch -- a truly grandmotherly thing to do -- and, when Oldest Son began to fuss, Long Suffering Spouse began urging an acceleration of these plans.

My wife's suggestions became more urgent as the clock ticked ominously toward Oldest Son's (self-)appointed mealtime. My mother wasn't listening, though. She couldn't help herself: There was always another pile of sale items en route to the elevator. And, I think, she probably thought my wife's increasingly ominous warnings were overblown -- inexperienced mothers worry too much. No, she must have thought, babies fuss when their lunch is delayed. Babies always fuss, but all will be forgiven and forgotten when we get to the dining room.

Long Suffering Spouse tried to explain to my mother the difference between normal fussing and what Oldest Son was about to do. And my mother must have thought, "Poor dear. She'll learn eventually. You just don't panic every time a baby cries a little."

But Oldest Son didn't fuss. And he didn't cry.

He erupted! He exploded!

He had store patrons looking for the air-raid shelter signs they'd not looked for since the early '60's. And he made these deafening shrieks all the way to the 7th floor -- and all the way to their table (they were seated quickly, for obvious reasons). He paused briefly when my wife stuck a bottle in his mouth. She'd had one ready; it needed only to be warmed and a staff person was only too glad to take the bottle from Long Suffering Spouse the moment if was proffered.

But the bottle came back boiling hot, something which, in her eagerness to get Oldest Son to subside, my wife didn't notice. Neither, for a blessed silent second or two, did Oldest Son.

But then he did notice.

And resumed shrieking.

Long Suffering Spouse dashed off to the ladies' room to try and cool the bottle down. My mother was left holding the baby. It must have been like holding an air horn that won't turn off. Imagine, if you will, a huge dining room filled with matronly ladies and their slightly stressed daughters or daughters-in-law and well-scrubbed and often bored grandchildren. You know that each and every one of them was staring at my mother at this point -- and their emotions must have run the gamut from aggravation to amusement. Several young mothers probably breathed a prayer of thanks that it wasn't their child doing this.

Eventually Long Suffering Spouse returned -- and Oldest Son stopped shrieking -- and my mother never took him shopping again.

Monday, May 05, 2008

Global warming is coming... well, not right away

Lord, please save us from well-meaning, partially-informed experts.

That's one prayer that comes to mind reading this article in the May 1 edition of Britain's Daily Mail.

I don't recall seeing this anywhere in the American press.

Anyway, the article acknowledges that global warming isn't happening nearly as fast as the doom-sayers have predicted.

A study by Dr. Noel Keenlyside, of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in Germany, published May 1 in the journal Nature, "predicts the temperature of the North Atlantic around Europe and North America may cool slightly" over the next decade because of a natural 80-year cycle of ocean currents, a "giant 'conveyor belt' of warm water from the south called the meridional overturning circulation."

Of course, the scientists don't contend that this disproves the global warming theory. They posit that "rising carbon dioxide levels caused by man will send temperatures up again after the natural trends peak and will continue to rise in following decades."

The actual Nature article is not available except to subscribers. However, a page has been set up on the Nature blog "The Great Beyond" to assure readers that the orthodox prediction of certain carbon dioxide doom remains intact. The post states, "What this new paper by Noel Keenlyside... sets out to do is incorporate data on short term variations in climate into our models of climate change. By doing this they push us into the arena of creating shorter term predictions, in this case of the next decade."

See? Nothing to worry about. Your cherished beliefs that all coastal areas will be flooded out may remain intact. Doom and gloom remains safely certain.

Now let me add my take: Good science demands making predictive models and testing them against experience -- and revising the predictive models in accord with experience. There is nothing wrong with predicting climate change -- the climate of this planet has been in flux since it was formed -- nor is there anything wrong with positing that mankind contributes to climate change.

The problem is in taking every gloomy prediction as Gospel truth -- and in fashioning draconian policies on the basis of the most awful predicted scenarios -- and, worst of all, in insisting that inconsistent findings be stretched or chopped in a procrustean bed to make them conform to the received wisdom.

Some scientists snicker at religion and chuckle at simpletons who believe blindly whatever they are told by their priests. I've always thought this a rather ignorant view. There are places where science can't take us; to visit these places we must rely on faith. The areas where science can go, the questions that science can answer, change over time... and you could see the boundaries of faith as retreating before advancing science. But I think they are parallel planes, science and religion. Through misunderstanding and ignorance, we have injected religion into places were science should be sovereign.

But it is just as ignorant to imbue science with the trappings of orthodoxy, and theories with the trappings of dogma.

I can't take global warming on faith.

I can accept the need for energy conservation and pollution control without embracing that pseudo-religion. Why isn't that enough?

When scientists can predict whether it will rain next Saturday with 100% accuracy, then and only then will I imagine that science can hope to predict with any great degree of accuracy what may happen a year or a decade or a century hence.

Please don't burn me at the stake.

Sunday, May 04, 2008

So -- where has Curmudgeon been this past week?

Well, I told you I needed a break -- but I didn't think it would last this long either.

But there's so much to do right now... and only limited time in which to do it.

It's actually been kind of nice these past few days to start in on the day's activities upon arriving at the Undisclosed Location... instead of blogging until noon. I'm getting reasonably caught up on a number of things -- and, if I get this brief I'm working on written today....

Of course, at the moment, I seem to be blogging. In truth, I'd rather be blogging... but I can't eat comments or deposit Sitemeter stats at the bank.

So I'm trying to work out a new schedule that will allow me to work and blog on the same day. I've got some ideas and I hope to begin implementing them this week.

That should put a rest to those nasty rumors that I've merely been loitering at the bank, waiting for my "stimulus" payment to come in....

Monday, April 28, 2008

Hair today, gone tomorrow

I finally broke down and got a haircut this weekend -- it's not that I didn't need one, it's just that I couldn't see blowing the better part of a double sawbuck on something that wasn't absolutely vital.

It's not that I'm cheap. It's that I'm broke and I'm cheap -- which makes for an ugly combination.

Especially Saturday morning.

It was so windy Saturday morning that the car door got away from me as I was trying to open it -- this was against the wind and I (almost) made the painful mistake of trying to grip the door with my right hand... which would have been entirely crushed about a millisecond after I made the attempt.

Chicago, you may know, is called the Windy City. But it's not for these gentle spring Zephyrs. Most historians agree it has to do with the volubility of our politicians (the volubility of our bloggers not being taken into consideration back in the 19th Century, when the nickname was coined, Al Gore having not yet invented the Internet).

But back to my hair. Even my loyal Long Suffering Spouse said I looked like a clown.

The sad part is, there is less and less hair on the top of my head, so when what's there gets long and windblown, it really does look clown-like. Bald clown-like.

Only my hair is gray.

My body instinctively knows that it is losing it's natural cover. And it's trying to compensate.

But it's aim is lousy.

That's the only explanation I can think of for the hairs sprouting at odd places on my ears. This morning I cut a three inch hair that had mysteriously sprouted beneath my eyebrows and above my eyelashes. I couldn't see it in the mirror, but I knew it was there because it was driving me crazy when I wore glasses. I thought I was looking through a haze.

So I got the haircut and I look appropriately businesslike and professional again. Ironically, with the hair very short I look less bald.

If you stand at certain angles.

And the lighting isn't too bright.

Maybe tomorrow I'll resume pontificating on matters of great import and moment. But, looking increasingly like the fellow on the right, it's hard even for me to take me seriously.

*Sigh*

A day off... maybe two

It's not because I'm in whiny self-indulgent mood (see above) that I'm taking a break from the Blogosphere today... and maybe tomorrow, too. It's just that it's the end of the month and I've got a lot to do. I know I'm not keeping up on my visits as it is, and I'll try and do better.

Just not today. OK?

Friday, April 25, 2008

A homebody torn between two homes

Anxious father week continues here at Second Effort.

Older Daughter has an away message on her gmail chat status congratulating her boyfriend. You've read about Older Daughter's Boyfriend here before. Recently, they marked a fifth anniversary as a "couple" -- but there was no announcement. I think Older Daughter was thinking there would be one; I think she was disappointed that no ring was proffered.

She's in that bridesmaid stage now -- tapped to be a bridesmaid in a number of weddings in the next year or so -- and she's starting to think about her own wedding....

Older Daughter's Boyfriend has apparently broached the topic -- I think if you asked him he'd say they have an understanding -- but the discussions have so far been theoretical. No hall has been rented. No church has been reserved.

I've written before how I think Older Daughter has tried, her whole life, to rearrange the universe to fit her wants and needs. Sometimes what Older Daughter wants is contradictory -- impossible under the laws of nature.

I fear this is one of those times.

Older Daughter is a homebody. She's happy to come back to the nest; frankly, we've had to push her out the door on occasion because she was obligated to be somewhere else. If the Boyfriend is waiting for her at his parents' home in Indianapolis, or at school in Champaign, he'll invariably have to call her cell phone once or twice to prod her into moving.

She's happier in Champaign now than she was in Indianapolis last year -- she likes nursing school so far and she didn't like her job in Indianapolis. But she still seems happiest at home. And the Boyfriend, who's getting a Masters degree in architecture from the University of Illinois could certainly find work in Chicago if he wants to.

It's pretty obvious that this is what Older Daughter wants.

But the Boyfriend is an only child. His family is well established in Indianapolis and he had a good job there last year before returning to school -- and that job is waiting for him when he returns.

And now we tie in the congratulatory note on Older Daughter's away message: It is for two things. First, he's received a fellowship that will allow him to finish his degree without financial embarrassment. He may actually pocket a few coins. Second, the head of the company for which the Boyfriend had worked in Indianapolis -- not an immediate supervisor mind you, but the head guy himself -- has taken a personal interest in the Boyfriend's budding career. And the head guy has political aspirations, too, apparently -- in Indiana of course -- and hopeful prospects at that, according to Older Daughter. And this man has indicated that the Boyfriend can hope for involvement in this arena as well... and the Boyfriend is definitely interested.

He's not moving to Chicago any time soon.

He's probably never moving to Chicago.

And Older Daughter, who wants the Boyfriend but wants Chicago too, is running headfirst into a hard reality: She's going to have to make a choice.

I think the choice is simple -- and I'll be most of you do, too: If Older Daughter wants a life with the Boyfriend, she had better get used to the idea of being a Hoosier. It's not like she would drop out of our lives entirely -- Indianapolis isn't that far away. And they have nursing jobs there, too.

But someone else's choices are always easier to make than our own. And an anxious father is sitting on the sidelines -- again -- able only to offer encouragement.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

A contest entry by an anxious father

I didn't tell anyone but Long Suffering Spouse when I entered Middle Son in a contest earlier this Spring.

It was something I saw on line -- the St. Louis Cardinals were looking for untapped talent and soliciting stats on line is a heck of a lot easier than staging an open tryout.

Please don't tell my pastor. I think he'd excommunicate me.

As a life-long Cub fan, born and reared in the German community on the North Side, Fr. Ed (no, not his real name) can't help himself: He hates, loathes and despises the Cardinals with an un-Christian fervor. Once, many years ago, we were working a reception after Sunday Mass, pouring coffee and looking the other way as the senior citizens pocketed as many sweet rolls as they dared. Middle Son was running around the room proudly wearing his new team t-shirt. All the park district teams are named for real, live major league teams. That year, Middle Son was a Cardinal.

Fr. Ed confronted me: "You let your son go out in public, dressed like that?"

My kids didn't understand Fr. Ed's reaction. As regulars here will know, Fr. Ed and I are separated by denominational differences, at least when it comes to baseball. And, of course, I've raised my children in the one true faith. So I translated for them: "It would be like someone wearing a Yankee jersey for us." All White Sox fans hate the Yankees. (This week has been particularly rough... but I won't digress.)

Which brings us back to the contest. It was early in the season when I sent in Middle Son's stats... and they were pretty sparse then.

He's 6'4" and 185 lbs. He's not yet 21 (and, oh, does that bug him). He doesn't have a blazing fastball. He's what they call a "crafty lefty."

I watch a lot of baseball on TV. And I listen to baseball games in the car when I can. I can't begin to estimate how many times I've heard an announcer talk about how a big left-handed kid can find work in the majors -- in the majors! -- if he can just get the ball over the plate.

But Middle Son is pitching for a Division III college. Small time. His stats have blossomed a bit since I sent that entry to the Cardinals: He's 5-0 overall this season -- 3-0 in conference -- with a nifty 2.00 ERA (2.52 in conference). He leads the staff in innings pitched in conference and -- here's the improvement that the casual fan like me can see -- he's tied for the staff lead in strikeouts in conference, and second on the staff overall. He was the number four starter when the season opened; he's probably the number two man now behind one of the seniors. (Middle Son is a junior.)

In the age of Billy Beane and Theo Epstein, stats are supposed to be the great predictor: It doesn't matter that you've pitched in small college ball or big-time NCAA Division I. They look for stats; if you have them, they will find you. Isn't that what they said in Moneyball?

But there's two kids on Middle Son's team who got invited to a better summer league this year (not the Cape Cod League, something out West, but still... an opportunity to be seen). Middle Son was not chosen.

The college season is already winding down -- April's not even over! -- and Middle Son interviewed for a summer internship yesterday. As an auditor. While he's pitched well, the team has faltered just a bit -- they've got a great record, but they've lost games they probably needed to win in order to secure an invite to the NCAA tournament. Middle Son is a team player; he's quite down in the dumps at the moment.

He sees baseball coming to an end for him. He's losing hope of reaching what he calls the "next level."

I want to encourage him to follow his dream -- but I don't want to push him to follow mine. And I begin to think those announcers who talk about lefty pitchers have exaggerated all these years.

And then I look at this guy. Mark Buerhle. 6'2" and 230 lbs. A graduate of Jefferson (Mo.) Junior College. A life-long Cardinal fan playing for the White Sox. His fastball tops out around 85 mph. That's about as fast as Middle Son gets, too. (He says he's hit 87 mph this season, but he doesn't claim that as a regular thing. And I don't carry a radar gun on me.)

I wish I could do more -- do something -- to advance Middle Son's cause. But all I can do is watch, and listen when he wants to talk.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Updates from the battle over prom

Or, in our case, proms. Plural.

You may recall, a couple of months ago, I revealed that I am not enthusiastic about proms....

Over thirty years ago, as I mentioned in that linked post, I was denouncing proms as pagan ceremonies where any remaining virgins were rounded up and ritually deflowered. Of course, I couldn't get a date to my own prom.

So I may have been bitter.... And, at the time, I was living in a small town.

Well, anyway, Younger Daughter accepted an invite to one young man's prom -- that's coming up on Friday.

She doesn't much care for the young man in question -- he, supposedly, harbors hopes of making Younger Daughter his girlfriend. Younger Daughter is attending, she says, only "as a friend." Conflict is likely to ensue.

And she did not invite this boy to her prom. That would have given him ideas she'd done her level best to squelch.

You must remember that, here in Chicago, many of our Catholic high schools are still single gender. That includes the schools where my children have gone. So getting a date isn't as simple as mustering up the courage to speak to someone after fourth period English. Because that someone isn't there.

So alternative means of identifying prom prospects are employed. There are meetings among the unattached girls, evaluating possibilities. These meetings extend well into the night via cellphone. And there's research: Facebook is consulted. And consulted. And consulted.

Recently, a new prospect surfaced. Younger Daughter announced she would probably ask "Paco" (not his real name). Paco attends the same school as Youngest Son. "I know who he is," Youngest Son told Long Suffering Spouse and me when we asked. "I think he bathes occasionally."

We were not particularly thrilled at this assessment.

Yesterday, Younger Daughter revealed that Paco had asked her to his prom and she reciprocated.

I had questions.

"Does he play drums or guitar?" (Younger Daughter seems inclined to like musicians.)

"He's an artist," she said.

"When you've tired of him, will he try and blow up our house?"

This was not an idle question. Last year somebody put roman candles fore and aft of our van and fireworks all around the front of our home. Particularly aggravating were the bricks of firecrackers that were on our front porch. When these all went off -- around 2:00 a.m. one weekend morning -- I sprang out of bed and ran down the stairs, threw open the front door, and was about to bull rush into the street looking for the miscreant or miscreants responsible... and I nearly stepped into the explosions on the doorstep. (And, no, I didn't blog about it at the time.)

Running onto the front step could have been painful.

We never did figure out who was responsible. Students or former students of my wife were suspected -- but so too were certain persons acquainted with Younger Daughter. Younger Daughter, in fact, seemed persuaded that the culprit was someone she knew... but she couldn't prove it and nothing ever came of it. The police -- though summoned -- didn't even make out a report.

But I really don't want it to happen again. I was relieved that the car wasn't destroyed by an errant fireball from one of the roman candles. I was grateful that the roof of our house was not ignited by any of the pyrotechnics. (And the absence of damage to anything other than my sleep was the reason why the police made no report.)

But that doesn't mean I'd be so lucky next time. So you can see, perhaps, why this question was one I felt I had to raise.

Younger Daughter's answer was equivocal. "I don't think so," she said.

The prom battles will continue.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Heads or Tails #35 (Direction)

Well. Late again -- two weeks in a row.

Anyway, in today's Heads or Tails, our virtual den mother, Barb, wants us to ruminate on the concept of "direction." (Or maybe she wants us to give us direction. Or to give me direction in particular. Such as write funnier posts. You may imagine a near-Gallic shrug here: I do what I can.)


I always know where I am and where I'm going: I'm right behind the 8-ball... and I'm going straight down the tubes.

Not everyone in my family was blessed with such an unerring sense of direction, however. Older Daughter, for example, was about 12 or so when we moved in to our present house. So when she decided to go for a walk in the neighborhood, we had no objection -- until she got lost going around the block.

We're still not certain how this happened. Not that she can explain it, of course.

Turn-by-turn in-car navigation systems are supposed to help directionally challenged people... but the devices don't always work as well as one might hope. Consider this recent case of a Wisconsin tourist driving down Cicero Avenue in Southwest Suburban Oak Lawn. According to the linked story, the "24-year-old driver was obeying his GPS system when he took a right turn onto the tracks and his car's undercarriage became lodged on the rail." His empty car was hit by a passing train before it could be moved.

Said Oak Lawn Division Chief Mike Kaufmann, "GPS will tell you something, but you still have to pay attention to what's going on."

I had a story here in January 2007 about a similar problem. A German driver, it seems, "suddenly veered to the left and ended up stuck on a railway track" simply because he was ordered to do so by his satellite navigation system.

According to that earlier story, "Several German motorists have crashed their cars in recent months, later telling police they were only obeying orders from their satnavs."

In recounting that tale, I resisted the temptation to make a politically incorrect remark about Germans just blindly following orders -- and, of course, now I'm so glad I did. I mean, it just happened to a guy from Wisconsin.

Whose name wasn't mentioned... and there are an awful lot of folks of German descent in Wisconsin.... but no, it doesn't mean he was German. Probably.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hat tip to Second City Cop for the link to the WBBM Newsradio 780 story.